My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV00159
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV00159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:57:52 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:43:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/11/2005
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Letter
From
DMG
To
Savage & Savage
Type & Sequence
TR13
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 8664567 <br />fAX: (303) 832A106 <br />August 11, 2005 ~~ <br />\~ <br />Mr. Michael S. Savage ~'~' ~~~A~~' ~~~ <br />Savage and Savage Environmental <br />4610 Haystack Drive <br />Windsor, CO 80550 <br />Re: Carbon Junction Mine, Permit C-92-080 <br />Technical Revision 13, Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Savage: <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />0.ECLANATION.NININ6 <br />SAf ETY•SCIENCE <br />siu Owens <br />Govertlar <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />Rnnald W. cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />We have completed a preliminary review of your submittal. We will prepare an estimate of those <br />costs for which you are proposing significant changes (compazed to the permit application's existing <br />2004 estimate). We need the following additional information before we can prepare our estimate. <br />Our first two comments are asked simply to clarify information in the submittal. <br />1. Please explain how recovering the 1,000 cyds of spoil in Task 1 will eliminate the need for <br />moving the 11,220 cyds of material in existing Task 2. <br />2. Task 8 (North Pit revegetation) refers to Task 90 (mob/demob). Is this reference to Task 90 <br />just a typographical error? If not, please explain how Task 90 reduces the proposed estimate of <br />North pit revegetation compared to the existing estimate. <br />We ask the following questions in order to verify that tasks include all completed work that has not yet <br />gone through the bond release process. <br />3. What volume amounts were used in the proposed estimates for Tasks 5 and 7? <br />4. In Task 24, what amount of riprap will be purchased and what amount will be obtained onsite? <br />5. Why will tasks 22, 28, 29, and 30 not be needed? <br />6. Please explain why regrading of the Old Carbon Junction Diversion (Task 40) is no longer <br />applicable. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Tom Kaldenbach <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Dan Hernandez, CDMG <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.