My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV00011
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV00011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:57:44 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:42:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/19/2003
Doc Name
Memo-Summary of Adequacy Review
From
Tom Kaldenbach
To
File
Type & Sequence
TR41
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX; (303) 832-8106 <br />MEMO <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />MIN&RALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION•MINING <br />SAFETY4CIENCE <br />Date: August 19, 2003 Bill Owens <br /> Governor <br />To: File Greg E. Walther <br /> <br />Permit number: <br />C-1980-001 (Edna Mine) Executive Director <br /> <br />Doc. Class: <br />Revision Ronald W. Cottony <br />Division Director <br />Doc. Type/Sequence• TR-41 Natural Resource Trustee <br />Doc. Name: Memo -Summary of Adequacy Review <br />From: Tom Kaldenbach <br />I have reviewed the above-referenced submittal. The submittal is technically adequate <br />based on the following three reasons. <br />Compliance with Pond Removal Requirements, Section 4.05.2(2) - As <br />explained in the attached Pond Removal Checklist, the operator's submittal for <br />this Technical Revision adequately documents the ponds are no longer needed for <br />sediment control and their removal will not result in a violation of the instream <br />standazds in Oak Creek. <br />2. Comment Period Expiration -The comment period has expired with no <br />comments received. <br />3. Reclamation Cost Estimate - The work proposed in this Technical Revision <br />involves reclaiming the Tipple ponds. The work involves no new land <br />disturbance and construction of no new structures; therefore, no change is <br />necessary in the reclamation cost estimate and the existing bond is adequate. <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Agive and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.