My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO31424
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO31424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:55:07 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:44:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999051
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/1/2001
Doc Name
Underground Injection Control
From
EPA
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit conditions may differ because the geological and hydrological conditions are not <br />identical. In this case, one difference involves the requirement for the amount of casing set below <br />the Dissolution Surface. The requirement for the minimum amount of casing between the <br />Dissolution Surface and the top of the cavity at Yankee Gulch Lease is ] 50 feet while the <br />minimum amount of casing between the Dissolution Surface and the top of the cavity at the Rock <br />School Lease is 200 feet because the non-productive interval between the Dissolution Surface and <br />the mining interval is larger at the Rock School Lease. Another difference is the maximum <br />injection pressure (700 psig for the Yankee Gulch Lease and 800 psig for the Rock School <br />Lease), which differs between sites mainly because of the depth of the mining interval. A review <br />of the overall construction requirements of the Rock School Lease Draft Permit indicates they are <br />similar to those in the recently issued Yankee Gulch Lease Permit. The Rock School Lease <br />Permit requires that the production casing be cemented to the surface as does the Yankee Gulch <br />Permit. The Yankee Gulch Permit and the Rock School Lease Draft Permit both required that a <br />cement bond or cement evaluation tool be run to ensure that adequate cement is behind the casing <br />to prevent fluid movement out of the cavities. Based on recent experience, however, the language <br />in the Rock School Lease Final Permit has been modified slightly to require that a cement bond <br />log and/or a cement evaluation log be run in the production and injection casings. This broader <br />flexibility will ensure that the logging results provide sufficient information to evaluate the cement <br />placement, bonding to the casing and strength. Depending on the type of cement utilized and the <br />configuration of the casing, it maybe necessary to run both logs. In addition, the casing must be <br />pressure tested prior to commencement of injection, and a temperature, noise or radioactive tracer <br />survey must be run after at least 60 days of operation, as also required by the Yankee Gulch Lease <br />Permit. <br />A review of the operating requirements in the Draft Permit indicate that the requirements <br />are consistent with those in other previously issued Class III sodium extraction permits. As a <br />result of the review, however, the section covering information required prior to injection was <br />modified to clarify the list of specific data and logs that must be submitted to obtain authorization <br />to inject. <br />A review of the ground-water monitoring program in the Rock School Lease Draft Permit <br />reveals some differences from that issued for other sites such as Yankee Gulch. These differences <br />are primarily due to the smaller scale of the initial stage of injection activity authorized by this <br />Permit which includes only three cavities. The Rock School Lease Draft Permit requires at least <br />five quarters of monitoring (on a monthly basis), as was required by the Yankee Gulch Lease. <br />Although the water quality sampling requirements are similar to those at other sites, there are <br />some differences which were approved by the various regulatory agencies as a result of a review <br />of the Regional water quality data in the vicinity. The operator is analyzing a shorter list of <br />constituents than at the Yankee Gulch Lease on a monthly basis, but a comprehensive analysis is <br />required once a quarter for the baseline period. Ground-water monitoring will continue after <br />baseline monitoring is complete. As a result of this review, minor changes have been made in the <br />Permit to clarify requirements for monitoring the dissolution surface during the baseline period <br />(monthly monitoring for the short list of constituents and quarterly monitoring for the long list) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.