My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO31384
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO31384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:55:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:40:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/26/1997
Doc Name
HAMILTON MINE GROUDWATER REVIEW
From
JIM BURNELL
To
HARRY RANNEY
Permit Index Doc Type
CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />iiiiiiiiiiiniiiiii <br />TO: Harry Ranney 26 Feb 1997 <br />FROM: Jim Burnell <br />SUBJ: Hamilton Mine Groundwater Review <br />At Larry Routten's request, I have reviewed the Groundwater <br />portion of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences discussion for the <br />Hamilton Mine's Mid-Term Review. <br />As you undoubtedly recognize, there is precious little to go on in <br />the way of water data for the site. Groundwater is monitored in <br />three different settings. They are as follows: <br />a) The bedrock aquifer underlying the coal-bearing sequence - the <br />Burro Canyon Aquifer, monitored in wells BW-1, 2, and 3, is <br />sampled to monitor the impact of the mining on the water level and <br />water quality. One of these wells, (BW-3) is upgradient of the <br />activities, one well (Bw-1) is apparently cross-gradient, and one <br />well (BW-2) is clearly down-gradient of the mining-related <br />activities. The monitoring program shows wells BW-1 and 3 to be <br />little impacted by the mining activities. Well BW-2 - the down- <br />gradient well - has been dry actually since before mining was <br />started. Hence, it is difficult to say if mining has had an <br />impact on this aquifer. Because the water-bearing unit is 100 feet <br />or more below the coal-bearing strata, separated from it by <br />largely impermeable layers, it seems unlikely that any significant <br />impact would occur, despite the clearly worst-case comments in the <br />PHC that mining could decrease the piezometric levels and degrade <br />the water quality. One could probably say that, but there has <br />been little evidence that either has occured to date. <br />b) Springs and seeps in and around the permit area were identified <br />and have been monitored as sites SP-1 through 6. According to the <br />narrative, these springs also emanate from the Burro Canyon <br />formation. They have been dry essentially since before mining <br />started. So, the conclusions to be drawn from the springs and <br />seeps is essentially the same as that from the bedrock wells <br />discussed above. <br />c) The third mode of groundwater occurrance monitored is alluvial <br />groundwater in several spots. <br />Well AW-3 was drilled within "Section 33 Creek," an unnamed <br />ephemeral stream channel in the midst of the mined area. <br />Wells AW-4 and 5 are in the channel of Braimers Draw where it <br />enters Naturita Creek. Braimers Draw drains the western half, <br />essentially, of the permit area. AW-4 is located on the up- <br />gradient side of an irrigation ditch - the Reed Chatfield ditch - <br />which (apparently) intersects and crosses the streambed. <br />Wells AW-6 and 7 are sunk in the alluvium of Naturita Creek, a <br />small flow that lies downstream (and North) of the permit area. My <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.