Laserfiche WebLink
<br />resulting in average TSS values <8. The finer fraction, which <br />appears to contribute to most of the total metals concentrations, <br />r still may be retained in the pond discharge. The retention of <br />i! the fine fraction may be due, in part, to disturbance from the <br />periodic underground mine discharge. The discharge probably <br />reduces the .gravity settlement ,,efficiency of the pond, and <br />turbulence would tend to keep fine material in suspension. Re- <br />routing of the mine discharge to the Area 2 pit would provide <br />surge control and minimize disturbance in Pond D. <br />5) The total metals concentrations in the pit overflow are <br />predominantly related to the disposal of waste rock from the <br />underground mining operation. This conclusion is based on two <br />observations. Firstly, total zinc concentrations in samples <br />taken from the oit prior to waste rock disposal were considera~b_ly <br />lower th t resent en ro ~'~CZSmm~)-: Se o'er y~-if <br />er quality ana yses from the Wedge sump and the Pond F Spring <br />are taken as representative of groundwater which has infiltrated <br />through backfill material, then this source does not make up a <br />r large proportion of the pit overflow water since zinc <br />aI7 ~,ls~s concentrations show ver different characteristics. Backfill <br />water has a large proportion o o a zinc concentration in a <br />dissolved state, whereas in it Ovate the zinc is almost <br />entirely in a suspended state. Diss ed concentrations of zinc <br />in backfill water are typically an orde of magnitude ~~gher than <br />in pit water. ~~- ~..c Flo ~I~~ <br />6) The underground mine contributes up to 99% of the .total <br />suspended solids entering Pond D. The primary source of the <br />• W~~ ~ ,?total zinc load flowing into Pond D is the underground mine <br />11 ~~bfe,inflow, although the pit overflow does contribute a. large amount. <br />FwQ°~7 The pit._overflow appears to be. the major source of..the total <br />silver load, with the underground mine contributing a large <br />proportion. 'The contribution of the underground mine may be <br />_ significantly underestimated, particularly in the latter samples <br />due to. the method of sampling, which allowed settlement of <br />~ suspended material. <br />E - .. <br />7) It is likely that a large amount of fine suspended material <br />resides in_the near-surface zone of the Area 2 Pit since gravity <br />settlement is not very efficient at removing this fraction and <br />_ the pit water is periodically disturbed by dumping of waste rock <br />material. A series of samples taken at various depths in the pit <br />would verify this hypothesis. If this proves to be correct then <br />a baffling system which would minimize the overflow of near- <br />surface water from the pit into Pond D should reduce the total <br />zinc and silver loading. <br />8) A full e~=luation of the ambi>nt stream water quality <br />monitoring data is not completed at this time, however it is <br />apparent that existing data indicate that ambient ccncentrations <br />of a number of parameters are significantly higher than current <br />sream standards for Segment 13 of the Yampa River. An increase <br />in the standard for parameters which are prese.ii:ly included (or <br />