Laserfiche WebLink
t . <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALT ,Water Quality Cantral Division <br />Rationale -Page 3, Permit Na. CO-0024562 <br />Hydrogeologic studies have examined the effects that this operation may have upon the quantity and quality <br />of waterJlowing jrom the Carlton Tunnel. The results ojllu studies indicate that the Jlowrate from the <br />tunnel may increase very slightly -ors the order 0.] rfs, and that pH and metal concentrations may remain <br />unaffected. While there is uncertainty associated with the various factors that wen considered in the <br />analyses that wen performed, it is likely that the monitoring of tiu Carlton Tunnel that is currently required <br />through the permit will be adequau to detect any sign(ficant changes in flow, pH or metals concentrations <br />that may be caused by the mining operation. This should apply even to metals that are not currently being <br />monitored, as the same jacton that would cause an increase in un-monitored metals concentrations would <br />similarly increase monitored metals concentrations. <br />With respect to cyanide, no monitoring ojthe Carlton Tunnel is currently required Even though the <br />Cresson mining project has been developed with the intent to contain all cyanide solutions within the <br />distribution system or impervious liners, it is possible jar spills or leaks to occur. Also, the project includes <br />plans for using cyanide contaminated tailings as part of the liner system. In the event of a release of <br />cyanide contaminated water, it is likely that such waters would Jlow to surface drainages in the vicinity of <br />the leach pad, and a separate permit is being written in order to address the potential for such discharges <br />jrom the Cresson operation. <br />Stilt, due to presence of various tunnels throughout the mining district which have intercepted and drained <br />groundwater underlying the area !o be mined, it is possible /hat cyanide contaminated Jlowt may travel <br />underground and reach the CarUan Tunnel. In order to allow such Jlows to be detected, this permit will be <br />amended to require quarterly cyanide monitoring of the Carhon Tunnel discharge. This will be done <br />through the amendment of page Ic and 4. <br />C. Whole E(Jluent Toxicity <br />The Division has recently developed new polities and permit requirements related to Whole Effluent Toxicity <br />(WET). The permit will be amended to include the new requirements, which are explained in the following <br />discussion. <br />For this facility, chronic WET testing is required. (See Pans I.A. and /.B. of the permit.) <br />1) Pnroose of WET Testinv: TTu Water Quality Control Division has established the use ojWET testing as <br />a method for ident(lying and controlling toxic discharges jrom wastewater treatment facilities. WET <br />resting is being utilized as a means to ensure that there are no discharges of pollutants "in amounts, <br />concentrations or combinations which are harmful to the beneficial uses or toxic to humans, animals, <br />plants, or aquatic 1((e" as required by Section 3.1.11 (1) ojthe Basic Standards and Melhodolosries for <br />Surface Waters. <br />2) Instream Waste Concentration i/R'Cl: Where monitoring or lirr+itattans jar WET are deemed <br />appropriate by the Division, chronic instream dilution as represented by the chronic /WC is critical in <br />determining whether acute or chronic conditions shall apply. For those discharges where the chronic <br />IWC is greater than (>) 9.196, chronic conditions apply, where the IWC is less than or equal to (5) <br />9.1 acute conditions apply. The chronic IWC is determined using tiu following equation: <br />IWC = [Facility Flow (FFj/(Stream Chronic Low Flow (annual) + FF)j X 100% <br />