My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO31087
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO31087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:54:47 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:13:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
5/6/1998
Doc Name
FINAL REVIEW OF MCC RESPONSES TO DIVISION REVIEW OF 1996 AHR WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007
From
DMG
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii -iiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dcparlmenl of Natural Re>wrces <br />1111 $hcrman $1., Room 215 J{yE~ <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80201 ~~ <br />Y <br />Phone: 13031866-3567 IIII <br />FAX: 1103) 832-8I0h <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br /> Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br /> lames S Lochhead <br /> Executive Director <br />May 6 <br />1998 Michael 8. Long <br />, Division DveUOr <br />Ms. Christine Johnston <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />P. O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, Colorado 81434 <br />Re: Final Review of MCC Responses to Division Review of 1996 Annual Hydrology <br />Report; West Elk Mine; Permit No. C-80-007 <br />Deaz Ms. Johnston: <br />The Division has reviewed Mountain Coal Company's second round of responses to the <br />Division's review of the 1996 Annual Hydrology Report (AHR) for the West Elk Mine. The <br />Division has the following remaining comments regazding the 1996 AHR, however; no further <br />responses aze required from MCC. <br />2. Response accepted. <br />3. No further response is required at this time. <br />5. Response accepted. <br />6. Response accepted. <br />8. No further response is necessary. As discussed in our March 19, 1998 meeting (1996 <br />AHR discussion), the Division requires a technical revision to the permit addressing the <br />need for replacement of wells that may not provide reliable information and/or may be <br />candidates for elimination from the program. This technical revision should be submitted <br />to the Division as soon as possible <br />11. No further response is necessary. See Division response to item number 8 above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.