My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO31030
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO31030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:54:45 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:09:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/24/1992
Doc Name
FINAL PERMIT COLO WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM COG-850023 ROCKCASTLE CO
From
CDOH
To
JOHN SERVATIUS
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PART II <br />Page 13 <br />Permit No. COG-350000 <br />A. MANAGEMENT AEQUTAEMENTS <br />5. Bvvass {continued) <br />a) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal inju:~, <br />or severe property damage; <br />b) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the <br />use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated <br />wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment <br />downtime. This condition is noC satisfied if the permittee could <br />have installed adequate backup equipment to prevent a bw ass <br />which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or <br />preventative maintenance; and <br />c) The permittee submitted notices as required in "Bypass <br />No cificacion", Part II.A.6. <br />6. Bwass Notification <br />If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, a notice <br />shall be submitted, at least ten days before the data of the bypass, <br />to the Division and the Environmental Protection Agency (EP.9). The <br />bypass shall be subject to Division approval and limitations imposed <br />by the Division and E: A. <br />7. Upsets <br />a) Effect of an Uosec <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought <br />for noncompliance •aith permit effluent limitations if the <br />requirements of paragraph b'of this sectior. are me c. (`Io <br />determination made during administrative review of claims that <br />noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action ..°or <br />noncompliance, is final administrative action subject ~~ judic_si <br />review.) <br />b) Conditions Necessary far a Demonstration of ?Jnset <br />A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of <br />upset shall demonstrate through oroperly signed contamtoraneous <br />operating logs, or ocher relevant evidence chat: <br />(i) An upseC occurred and [hat the permittee can :dencif~ t.`:e <br />specific cause(s) of the upset; and <br />(ii) The permitted facility was at the time being preoerly <br />operated; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.