Laserfiche WebLink
/ c-of-6z3o-2 <br />'Rev. 1/6/;; <br /> <br />• <br />T0: Area Pianager .L• 5 i2 (~ DATE: 3 - / 6 - 77 <br />FROK: District Archaeologist <br />SUBJECT: Compliance with FEO 11543 and Sec. 106 of the Historic <br />Preservation Act of 19b6. <br />Case No.:~trt~ In~c~f~.t~~nr~ I~~Cur?• Contractor No./Name:' ~ ,( u,;.? 96 -•Y <br />C/~tt.t9 i1;~c~t. ~1 c(. r1v ~r LlrC~ ~ <br />The docucentation provided by ~/~.(.~~rlllcrnS * ('.H.T~~nnrnot .~C/4A <br />/~-/'Is adequate for compliance with FEO 11593. <br />~~ Is adequate to substantiate a dete urination of no effecr. <br />/ /Will require preparation and subr..ission of a 106/2 (b) case. <br />/ / Is adequate [o provide the basis for a Lete urination of no <br />adverse effect. BL~1 will have to present its case to the <br />Historic Preservation Officer and to the National Advisory <br />Council o:i Historic Preservation. <br />s _ <br />~ /Demonstrates that an adverse effect will occur. <br />/ /Will require consultation with the contractor [o resolve cer- <br />tain questions. See attached analysis. <br />/ / Is inadequate for compliance purposes because:. <br />I recomcend that the following mitigating measures be incorporated as <br />special stipulations. <br />cc: contractor <br />C.S.O. (CO-931) ' <br />G//Ci/( //1~`"c~~C.hcNC/ CiC/!9 l~y7L/~rfiI'a'r/1G/ /~'/rL7~ <br /> <br />