My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE73180
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE73180
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:50 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:35:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix K Part I to VI
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. _ ,.1. <br />• and precautions which should be observed when working near an active sur- ~ <br />face tine. Once Sn the survey area, the LOPA crew conducted a series of <br />• swe_ps through the region with erex mergers separated by epproxlmateiy 150 ft <br />to 200 ft. M area not actually traversed by the survey crew was the south- <br />.. <br />' "' " ~ ~ veste sloae of the eastern rid e~ ~Thii e t 1 1 ( 20 ' <br />^: r . <br />`.:.. .. <br />I <br />i. <br />C, <br />1 <br />;~ <br />:! <br />F <br />Resource #anagea>Bnt aeport !o, laboratory of Public Archaeology, Colorado <br />SCate University. <br />The contractor should be warned, however, due to the fact that buried <br />archaeological sites have not Deen detected during the survey, any discov- <br />eries are to be reported to the BLM District Archaeologist. All land-distur- <br />\bing work in the vicinity of the find is to be halted ir~re'diately and not <br />begun again until the find can be evaluated by a trained archaeologtst, <br />The preparation of this report was supervised by Dr, Lalvln N. Jennings, <br />Director of LOPA, The archaeological survey was carried out 1n compliance <br /> <br />rn 9 x r'es~ y step s ope over <br />percent grade) Baas inrgely inaccessabie and was corposed of ~n~r:rous cliff <br />• ' faces and falus~slcpes. The area was visually scanned For overhangs or . <br />..;. ..,I <br />.- _ - - - <br />accessable ledges which sight proYide enough area for n hahitatlon site or~;;.'.~~•~ <br />' ...: .:; r. .. .::... .. <br />.., rock art•7ocaiton;. Mo areas of ihfs nature xere observed. _ _ <br />Ro prehistoric or historic archacological,cvterial5.rrare found.ln or : '~~~ ;'~"= <br />- - - :~: <br />..near the•project area. • Thisresult rras not ca-~letely~unexpected due,`to <br />the e~ctr~iy rough terrain surveyed and the distance from any percranent <br />Hater source. The S4i]llams Fork River 1s located approximately ] m1 to the" <br />feast, The lack of archaeological ratertels in this aree~was also ezp^_cted -`;:i <br />~..:' .. <br />because of the findings of a previous archaeological study which extended •. <br />:... :; <br />from the western boundary of the current survey area to.•the. H111{ams Fork `,~ ., :.' ~ , <br />-. <br />River. The results of this study can be found in Paul William' Archeeologtcel <br />Reconnelasance of the Utah Internetlonel Cretg Underground Prajeet, Cultural ~.~, <br />{J ~C• <br />-:~~ <br />a : > .:. <br />`_,~. __ <br />5.~--.. <br />:-~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.