Laserfiche WebLink
• (2) Not applicable. <br />2.03.7 Relationship to Areas Designated Unsuitable £or Mining. <br />(1) The areas of Leases C-37210 and C-27432 were <br />studied for designation as unsuitable for <br />mining prior to obtaining the leases in May, <br />1984, and September, 1979, respectively. <br />Unsuitability criteria were applied to the <br />lands of Lease C-37210 in the BLM's update of <br />the Management Framework Plan and <br />Environmental Impact Statement for Round Two <br />of the Uinta-Southwestern Utah regional coal <br />sale. With the application of exceptions to <br />the criteria, and provided certain mitigation <br />measures were followed, the tract was <br />considered suitable for mining (USDOI BLM, <br />1983). <br />Based on an Environmental Analysis written on <br />the Lease C-27432 tract, the BLM concluded <br />that the area fell under none of the <br />• unsuitability criteria. A copy of the <br />unsuitability study can be found in the TE/EA <br />Appendix, Volume 9A which contains Technical <br />Examination/Environmental Analysis done by the <br />BLM on the Lease C-27432 application. <br />Unsuitability criteria were applied to the <br />lands of Lease COC-53356 in conjunction with <br />the Uncompahgre Basin Resource Management Plan <br />(1989) and the Uinta-Southwest Utah E18 <br />(1983). Unsuitability decisions affecting the <br />Lease COC-53356 application area were reviewed <br />and exceptions to Criteria 11 and 14, found <br />applicable to the lease C-37210 tract, were <br />also found to apply to this tract. In <br />addition, new exceptions to Criteria No.'s 9 <br />and 14 were found to apply to Lease COC-53356. <br />Discussion of the new exceptions found <br />applicable is presented in Environmental <br />Analysis U-92-34 (BLM, 1992) completed for <br />this tract and included in the TE/EA Appendix, <br />Volume 9A. 2 7 <br />• <br />m R-(O g Rev. 2/27/96 <br />/~PpRoVC.I~ 27 Rev. 9/21/2001 <br />6~~. s ~o Y <br />