My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72922
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:27 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:29:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 26a Geotechnical Investigation Refuse Disposal Area (Revised)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• protect toe buttress excavations and drain sections which have been constructed <br />but not covered with coal waste. This should control contamination of drain rock or <br />silting in the excavations due to surface water flows during storms. <br />Drain Construction <br />Drain locations, sections and material requirements are shown on Figs. 3 and <br />4. The drain and filter materials will not require compaction. The material should be <br />loose dumped to provide a continuous section with the minimum dimensions shown. <br />The drain and filter material should be protected from excessive contamination. <br />~ Cover Material <br />The cover layer will consist of 2.5 feet of soil and approximately 1.5 feet of <br />• topsoil, for a total cover thickness of 4.0 feet. Cover soil can be obtained by <br />excavating native soils, bedrock or spoil materials in the area. Our calculations <br />indicate that the overall surface area of the proposed RDA is about 2 percent greater <br />~ than the surface area beneath the RDA. The ratio will vary for different areas of the <br />pile as construction proceeds from north to south. During excavation and <br />stockpiling, soil volumes will increase (swell), and with nominal compaction will then <br />~ decrease. Volume change due to shrinkage during excavation and placement is <br />estimated to be 5 percent. <br />The increase in the area of the RDA, compared to the area which the RDA <br />~ covers, may require an increase in the depth of cut for cover soils. If cover soil is <br />to be obtained from below the pile, our best estimate is to increase the planned <br /> <br />depth of cut for cover soil by 7 percent. For example, if a 2.5-foot depth of cut is <br />. planned, then increasing the depth of cut 7 percent would result in a cut of 2.8 <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.