My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72902
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:26 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:28:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/16/1981
Doc Name
PRELMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW OUR FN 81-185-MAY DAY MINE
From
MLR
To
FERGUSON ENGINEERS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO nor ~aann iaMrd ,~~ III IIIIIIIII IIII III <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURA~RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe. Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />September 16, 1981 <br />Mr. John N. Ferguson <br />c/o Ferguson Engineers . <br />1911 Main Street, N223 <br />Durango, Colorado 81301 <br />Re: Preliminary Adequacy Revi ego <br />Our File No. 81-185, May Day Mine <br />Dear Mr. Ferguson: <br />As we discussed Friday evening, I have completed my preliminary adequacy <br />review for the application you prepared on behalf of the Great Guennol <br />Mining Company. The plan looks very good, except for a few details, which <br />I will Zist below: <br />1. The mining plan should provide a better discussion of the rock materials <br />to be dumped in the waste piles. A scaled sketch of the three permitted <br />areas must show these dumps and the dumpsite foundation and dump construc- <br />tion should be discussed. <br />2. Water encountered in the mine should be discussed and an analysis of <br />these waters would be very helpful in assessing long-term effects on the <br />prevailing hydrologic balance. <br />3. What areas will be revegetated? These areas should be delineated on <br />a map. <br />4. The proposed seed mix looks very heavy in Mountain Bromegtass. We <br />suggest you revise this mixture to reduce the Afountain Bromegrass and <br />include some Western wheatgrass, Bluegrass, a little Yellow Sweetclover <br />and some Mountain Snowberry. <br />This application is scheduled for presentation at the September 23-29 MLR <br />Board meeting. It is important that the concerns expressed above be re- <br />solved prior to September 21, 1981. You must also provide evidence that <br />the public notice requirements of Rule 3.2 have been satisfied prior to <br />9~ September 21, 1981. <br />M <br />Q~ <br />u ~ ~ <br />~~~ ~_ <br />w~E~i~~w <br />~ ,r <br />~ ~ ~ <br />~ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.