My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72813
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:20 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:26:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/25/2005
Doc Name
1st A.R. - Modifications to Application
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MMRR Quarry, M-2004-067 <br />Response to Jan. 21 Adequacy Review <br />March 23, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />that the reclaimed pit floor elevation is achieved after all excess unusable <br />material under the 10-year mining plan has been used as backfill. <br />Realignment of the main access road requires an adjustment of the <br />original estimate of waste rock generated in the start-up of the quarry. <br />The new alignment will generate an additional 400,000 cubic yards of cut, <br />more or less. By virtue of the site layout, this volume of material must be <br />primarily hauled off-site prior to the opening of the access road, <br />processing pad, waste rock pile, and other options for use on-site. <br />Process Fines. As a percentage of quarry rock crushed on the site, the <br />MMRR Quarry is anticipated to yield a typical volume of process fines. <br />Because no sand or fine-grained fraction is anticipated to be significant <br />portion of the pit run at the MMRR Quarry, the typical yield of fines may be <br />less than 1 % of input by weight. <br />For the purposes of Rule 6.4.4(f), the applicant will estimate a maximum <br />volume based on a 3% fine yield by weight. Given reserves of at least 10 <br />million tons under the mining plan, this results in a maximum tonnage of <br />fines generated over the life of the proposed operation of 300,000 tons, or <br />a volume of approximately 200,000 cubic yards. Fines will not be <br />stockpiled for any significant amount of time and will not accumulate <br />beyond the capacity of the processing area. Fines will either be used as a <br />substrate in reclaimed areas (to a depth of 2 feet, see Exhibit E) or <br />classified as unusable and backfilled in the pit floor as described above. <br />Drainage Design. The technical response to this review comment is <br />definitively provided by the memorandum of the project engineer. <br />The revised plans for drainage include an initial diversion around the <br />waste rock pile. This diversion will convey undisturbed area runoff around <br />the waste rock pile and back into the ephemeral drainage downstream of <br />the mining facilities. <br />The diversion ditches will generally be excavated in rock and not subject <br />to erosion. If the ditch is located in earthen substrate, riprap lining will be <br />placed to prevent erosion. <br />Best management practices (BMPs) will be used to minimze sediment <br />production and capture eroded sediments near their source. Sediment <br />ponds will be constructed to capture sediment that could be eroded from <br />operations areas. In addition, porous rock check dams will be installed in <br />the access road drainage ditches to assist in trapping eroded sediment. <br />These measures will effectively minimize the risk of erosion from the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.