Laserfiche WebLink
eh <br />ESPEY, HUSTON d. ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />• <br />3. The coal bins aze considered to be silos, therefore, no fugitive dust <br />control is planned. <br />4. All transfer points in the system will be covered or contained in a <br />manner acceptable to the State of Colorado Depaztment of Health, <br />Air Pollution Control Division. <br />The fugitive dust control plan presented herein should meet the require- <br />ments of the State of Colorado Depaztment of Health, Air Pollution Control <br />Division. This information is presented for information only. The decision by <br />United States District Judge Thomas J. Flannery dismissed this portion of the <br />regulation in his order dated 16 May 1980. The decision defined fugitive dust as <br />wind erosion only. Proper revegetation and periodic watering is the normal practice <br />• for fugitive dust control from wind erosion. <br />Results of TSP testing for sites 1 and 2 aze contained on Tables- N-1'~ <br />and 'N-2. The annual average and number of samples collected aze <br />included in the tables. ~ <br />Special stipulations for haul road fugitive dust control aze con- <br />tained is each air quality permit. These stipulations will be <br />explicitly adhered to. <br /> <br />N-2 <br />