My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72604
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72604
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:09 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:21:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
POND 012 LANDSLIDE REPAIR PLAN & SUBSEQUENT SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 13 ATTACHMENT 13-12B and Addendum 13-12B-A To 13-12B-E
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Michael Boulay <br />• March 14, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />apparent signs of any movement at that time. The weather over the <br />next few days was warm and sunny enough that the majority of the <br />snowpar~k melted, since this south-facing slope was mostly bare on <br />the 6t . <br />Based on discussions we had that morning at the pond site, we <br />decided that the ground was still to wet to bring any equipment <br />onto the area of the elide to make any repairs because of safety <br />concerns and potentially causing additional damage due to the <br />weight of the equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation <br />measures were agreed upon by DMG and SCC, to try and prevent any <br />additional damage to the area and still monitor the elide <br />activity: <br />1. Carefully manage and monitor the surface water above the elide <br />area. The suggestion made was to cut two ditches across the <br />haul road itself above the elide in the portion of the road <br />where it veers back to the east going up the hill. That way <br />any future surface water in the road ditch would be diverted. <br />to the ditch on the inside road edge. We made an attempt that <br />afternoon to get a road grader to cut these ditches, but <br />• snowfall that afternoon prohibited the equipment from getting <br />over to that portion of Haul Road D. The weather was fine the <br />next day and SCC was able to get some ditches established to <br />prevent any water from reaching the slide area. <br />2. Place some survey stakes on the slide body toe just above the <br />pond water level to monitor deformation into the pond. This <br />will allow some method to determine if the pond storage volume <br />is being substantially reduced. Also, place some survey stakes <br />at the pond water level to enable water level monitoring <br />within the pond. This will permit monitoring of available <br />storage volume in the pond as snow melts in the drainage area. <br />One line of survey stakes (pink flagging) was placed in the <br />main body of the slide running the entire length of the slide <br />on Wednesday. A survey was also conducted showing the extent <br />of the slide area. The results of that survey are contained in <br />the daily inspection portion of this discussion in item number <br />3. A second set of survey stakes (green flagging) was placed <br />at the toe of the slide on Friday. Several electronic photos <br />of the slide area were taken that day and forwarded to all <br />parties concerned on Monday the 13th. <br />3. The slide body was to be checked daily over the next few days <br />to ensure that it has in fact stabilized. Once it has <br />stabilized, the slide should be checked weekly or after any <br />storm or snowmelt events that could produce substantial <br />• surface water runoff. Results of these daily inspections are <br />presented below: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.