My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72422
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72422
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:17:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998105
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/3/1999
From
WSERC
To
WALLY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 01;29199 a5: 11 F.iL 9i0527199i HIGH COONTRF YEw <br />• • <br />boa <br />Ml'. Fsiltsoa's rationale report discounted our suggestion that a restoration plan include both deep <br />and shallow water habitat because be said there are concerto over mosquito breeding. As far as we can <br />~!!, 6eie8 t~aceraed about mosquito contml does not fall withinshestatutes of the Art and Rules any <br />rttore than dust or noise conoool. He also criticized our suggestion that any riparian or wetland area be <br />tt:vtgeffiOed with epp[n~date 8nec~ caving nor all wPrlandc ctg~liara aarpe nn what is anmm~riare rn <br />1>hfAt to tfi9Qt[bed wetland ar riparian areas. These picky points miss the intent and heart of our comments- <br />~lAt 91E atL aSi<1Cg IB Ihat a 1~eClamaUOa.jllaa look mote like a rectnratinn plan and that the hoaid_nnt <br />a~tputl~me the etnlogic~l integrity of the Gunnison River by allowing a rich and varied, aesthetically and <br />i~tant urPtland anti rip~tian an+a to M tranafp~ into a ~Pnm ttir ant of d ~ k Woods <br />DMG should go beyond simply grAdiag the area in 2 to 1 and 3 to 1 slopes to require a more natural and <br />ecalapcaUy appropriate desi~ that ip~lnd c ahnllpW na cl d~:e water hahitat Tn that Pnd qE c i~;gPCt <br />hiring a*e i>sajeprad~t party or team including as environmental engineer, biologist and ecologist trained <br />~¢ l~(at n~nlar~nt Ae atat{d~ 'nualy WP fPPI tt1P~a~y Cnnfl11P71rP l~3rk rnnld aJn yp a, ern <br />ep~gpniala model in thrs ptuauit <br />Rle also ask that the board consider the impact of approving a gravel mine on a site that could soon <br />•~e ~ ~~ ~ ]D,~~g ~nall~ Wort the National Park Ce~P and ntFte~rynnhlir agenriee dPtey~nP <br />the gtt7mGe(rea4'on.af their water rights. How would the presence of a gravel mine affect river channel <br />st$I,~ity id t~t t~~ and knp~ ~p C.ranri iunctirm~ and Cnn~ eaihly miti sort such a hi oh <br />fiOw7 VPaLout knowing the river's futute flow, we feel it is not possible to accurately evaluate the impacts <br />~~pg ~ mr• swk;f~ j0 ~aaidPi ping finalVg).pf this annlirarinn until the flow hoc <br />hrart deed. <br />'~~ y~ f~ ~nnr limp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.