My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72419
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72419
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:22:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:17:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/21/2005
Doc Name
Exhibit 156
From
City of Black Hawk
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom Schreiner <br />May 25, 2005 <br />Page 15 <br />• <br />19. A plan is required to be submitted as part of the DMG permit application showing how pH, <br />total suspended solids, and oil & grease limits will be met. <br />20. A containment plan along with identification of specific spill prevention measures to be used <br />must be provided by the applicant showing how compliance with the oil and grease discharge <br />limit for the sedimentation ponds will be ensured. <br />21. Reclamation is required on all the affected land (MLRB Rules, §6.4.5(2)). <br />22. The applicant restores the pre-mining wildlife habitat of dense shrubs (200-500+ per acre) <br />and scattered trees as opposed to the proposed strips and patches of grassland with a few <br />trees and shrubs (20 per acre). <br />23. The revegetation plan is to provide for the greatest probability of success in plant <br />establishment and vegetation development by considering factors such as precipitation, soil <br />texture and fertility, slope stability, appropriate seeding practices, etc. (MLRB Rules, <br />§3.1..10(4). Methods of weed control shall be employed For all prohibited noxious weed <br />species (MLRB Rules, §3.1.10(6)). <br />24. Additional conditions should include information provided in Ms. Carson's letter dated May <br />• 25~', 2005. <br />25. The financial warranty is required to be set and maintained at a level which reflects the actual <br />current cost of fulfilling the requirements of the Reclamation Plan (MI,RB Rules, §4.2.1(1)}. <br /> <br />26. The applicant must obtain approval from Gilpin County prior to constructing a cistern or <br />lined pond. <br />27. The applicant must obtain an approved Special Use Review Pemrit from Gilpin County prior <br />to initiating any operations. <br />28. The applicant must submit a statement identifying the permits, licenses, and approvals the <br />applicants holds or will be seeking for the proposed mining and reclamation activities <br />(MLRB Rule, 1.4.1(5) (d)). <br />a. If the applicant fails to provide the information, the application should be denied due <br />to violation of MLRB Rule § 1.4.1(3). <br />29. The applicant must apply for and receive an approved, valid, Highway Access Permit from <br />the County prior to initiating any operations. <br />30. The applicant must comply with MLRB Rule §6.3.12 by providing either (a) a notarized <br />agreement between the Applicant and BHCCSD that the Applicant is to provide <br />compensation for any damage to BHCCSD's sanitary sewer line; (b} an appropriate <br />engineering evaluation that BHCCSD's sanitary sewer line will not be damaged by activities <br />LEONARD RICE ENGINEERS INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.