Laserfiche WebLink
Comment: <br />27. Section VI.D.2.61. page 21 <br />As stated in our previous comments, all discharge points should be monitored for <br />the same analytical suite as Dischazge Point 001. These additional data should be <br />reported on the same frequency (monthly) as the 001 data. <br />Response: <br />See responses to General Comment No. 1 and Specifc Comment No. 18. <br />Comment: <br />28. A~nendix B <br />See our previous comments on the mass balance analysis assumptions. <br />Response: <br />See response to Specific Comment No. 19. <br />Comment: <br />29. Permit, Part II.A.8. oaee 24 <br />It is our opinion that this section requires the WQCD to specifically define <br />dischazge points for the window and the seeps. See General Comment 2 <br />regrading [sic] additional dischazge points. <br />Response: <br />See response to General Comment 2. <br />Mounmin Resources, lnc. HSr GeoTram <br />28 /~~Y u, aooo <br />