My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO30314
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO30314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:49:03 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:14:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/24/2000
Doc Name
DRAFT CDPS PN CO-0045675 RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT
From
BATTLE MTN GOLD
To
WQCD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Seco and its alluvium. Otherwise, the mass balance analysis underpredicts the <br />total loading from West Pit to the luto Seco system which, it turn, allows for a <br />greater loading from Discharge Point 001. <br />Response: <br />The primary water management objective of the TR-026 water management plan <br />is to modify the hydrologic system in the vicinity of the West Pit to eliminate the <br />flow of groundwater from the West Pit into the adjacent Rito Seco alluvial <br />aquifer. BMRI has received fmal approval of the TR-026 water management plan <br />from the DMG. As noted previously, the hydraulic gradient has been reversed <br />such that there is no mass loading to the Rito Seco from the seepage front because <br />the flow of groundwater from the West Pit has been eliminated through the <br />implementation of the TR-026 water management plan. <br />Comment: <br />20. Section VI.A.4.c, page 14, table <br />The acute and chronic Q values are reversed (compaze to Section III.B.2). The Q3 <br />data presented in this table aze also incorrect. Is this error propagated throughout <br />the entire report? <br />Q1 only includes flow derived from Dischazge Point 001. See Comment Number <br />19 regazding the inclusion of seepage front in a complete analysis of the impact of <br />West Pit dischazge on the Rito Seco system. <br />Response: <br />No comment. <br />See the response to Comment Number 19. <br />Comment: <br />21. Section VI.A.4.d, page 14, Item (i) and pace 15, first pazagraph <br />The wording in this section is very confusing. Our interpretation of item (i) on <br />page 14 is that the activity does not result in significant degradation because it is <br />not diluted by 100 to 1 or more at low flow. However, the statement on page 15 <br />indicates that item is (i) is not applicable since the dilution ratio is less than 100 to <br />1. We believe that Item (i) is applicable and should be considered in the <br />antidegradation review. <br />Bat(!e Mountain Resources, /nc. HSl GeoTrans <br />25 July 2/, 1000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.