Laserfiche WebLink
Comment: <br />8. Section IV.A.1, page 4, pazagranh 5 <br />It is our understanding that TR-26 has not been fully approved by the DMG. <br />Discussion of and/or incorporntion by reference of TR-26 in the permit should be <br />restricted to those portions of TR-26 that have been approved by the DMG. <br />Furthermore, because this permit relies heavily upon the technical discussions <br />provided in TR-26, the permit is incomplete without having the document <br />attached. <br />Moreover, TR-28 has not been approved nor has it passed the DMG's adequacy <br />review. Consequently, TR-28 should not be used as a basis for this permit. <br />Response: <br />TR-026 was formally approved in its entirety by the DMG on May 23, 2000. As <br />noted previously, TR-028 has been withdrawn from consideration by the DMG. <br />Comment: <br />9. Section IV.A.1, page 4, pazagraph 6 <br />As-builts of the french drain sump system(s) must be provided to allow for an <br />independent assessment of their effectiveness. RMC pointed this out in its <br />comment letter dated September 10, 1999, which was transmitted to the CDPHE <br />under cover of a September 10, 1999 letter sent by Lori Potter regazding BMRI's <br />"Minimal Discharge Industrial Wastewater Permit Application". <br />Response: <br />No response necessary. <br />Comment: <br />10. Table V-1, page 6 <br />All pH data, field and laboratory, should be provided to support the statement that <br />laboratory analyses tend to be less than the field measured pH. <br />These data aze only for Dischazge Point 001. Water quality data collected from <br />the seeps and window azea groundwater monitoring wells should also be included <br />and discussed in this section. <br />Bartle Mounmin Resources, /nc. HSf GeoTrans <br />20 July 1l, 1000 <br />