Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT D -MINING PLAN <br />GEOLOGY <br />The Fort Hays Limestone Member (Niobraza Formation) was deposited in a shallow <br />seaway which covered the Western Interior of North America during the Late Cretaceous <br />period. (-88.0 million years ago). The distribution o-f the characteristic interbedded white <br />to light gray limestones and dark gray shale interbeds was controlled to a large extent by <br />distance from the western shoreline of the ancient Cretaceous seaway. Over the course of <br />hundreds of thousands of years the accumulated skeletons of calcium carbonate-secreting <br />planktonic microorganisms (e.g. calcareous nannofossils) formed the nearly pure <br />limestones visible in numerous surface exposures around the City of Pueblo. As these <br />microscopic animals required relatively clear, sunlit seawater to survive, the limestone- <br />dominated belt of Fort Hays rocks doesn't extend as far west as the position of the <br />"paleobeach". The location of these ancient shoreline deposits (present site for the town <br />of Price, Utah) is an area dominated by sandstone and mudstone rocks, with no <br />limestone. [The most westerly outcrop of the Fort Hays Limestone is at Newcastle, CO - <br />a locality having no pure limestone beds due to the high amount of mud and silt from the <br />western sediment source area]. <br />The Fort Hays Member at the Rio Grande properties in Pueblo County, in contrast, are <br />predominantly pure limestone, with very thin shale interbeds. The shales are free of <br />• excessive quantities of pyrite and associated sulfide minerals, due to the well-oxygenated <br />nature of the seafloor during deposition of the Fort Hays; therefore, the area immediately <br />southeast of Interstate I-25 that has been drill core sampled and tested by Rio Grande <br />contains much less organic carbon-bearing, fine-grained mudrock than the foothills to the <br />west, an observation easily verified by visual analysis of the numerous Fort Hays cores <br />presently archived in Pueblo. Geochemical testing of these limestones (from Rio Grande <br />lands) indicates that they contain some of the lowest concentrations of kerogens and <br />sulfur-based by-products of any carbonate rock presently exploited as a resource by the <br />cement industry in Mexico, Canada, and the United States. <br />Findings of the August 2000 geologic report by Christopher J. Collom, Ph.D are <br />summarized in the following four main points: <br />1. The proposed Rio Grande plant/surface mine site in Pueblo County, Colorado is within <br />the "central limestone-dominated" belt of the Fort Hays Member (in terms of the total <br />geographic distribution of the Fort Hays Member); in contrast, at least two cement <br />operations in Colorado are located in and utilizing less pure Fort Hays resources from the <br />"western argillaceous-dominated" belt. <br />2. Relative to the western shoreline of the Late Cretaceous-age seaway (that covered <br />essentially all of Colorado during the deposition of the Fort Hays Member), the proposed <br />Rio Grande site is sufficiently distant from the prevailing sediment-supply to avoid <br />contamination by siliciclastic muds (thus, the majority of the sediments observed are <br />• detritus-free limestones) -additionally, north to south geostrophic ("longshore") currents <br />D-1 <br />