My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO30295
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO30295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:49:03 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:12:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
3/4/1993
Doc Name
CERTIFICATION COAL MINING GENERAL PERMIT
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PART II <br />Page 18 <br />Permit No. COG-850000 <br />A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS <br />S. Bwass (continued) <br />a) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of Life, personal injury, <br />or severe property damage; <br />b) There were no feasible alternatives Co the bypass, such as the <br />use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated <br />wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment <br />downtime. This condition is not satisfied if the permittee could <br />have installed adequate backup equipment to prevent a bypass <br />which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or <br />preventative maintenance; and <br />c) The permittee submitted notices as required in "Bypass <br />Notification", tart II.A.6. <br />b. By~ass Notification <br />If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, a notice <br />shall be submitted, at lease ten days before the dace of the bypass, <br />to the Division and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The <br />bypass shall be subject to Division appro•oal and limitations imposed <br />by the Givision and EPA. <br />7. Uosets <br />a} Effect of an Uoset <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought <br />for noncompliance with permit effluent limitations if the <br />requirements of paragraph b of this section are met. (No <br />determination made during administrative review of claims that <br />noncompliance was caused by upseC, and before an action For <br />noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial <br />review.) <br />b) Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Uoset <br />A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of <br />upset shall demonstrate through properly signed contemporaneous <br />operating logs, or ocher relevant evidence chat: <br />(i) An upset occurred and chat the permittee can identify the <br />specific cause(s) of the upset; and <br />(ii) The permitted facility was at the time being properly <br />operated; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.