My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE72086
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE72086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:21:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:06:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION V MINE SURFACE FACILITIES RECLAMATION PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• While permanent revegetation success standards were not reached within the first five growing <br />seasons, data indicated that the plots were maturing toward the standards. <br />• Since vegetative cover and production data indicate higher levels on test plots with more soil <br />cover, it appears depth of soil cover material is a limiting factor and that successful revegetation <br />can be achieved with less than four feet of soil cover. <br />• Results of this study indicated that aspect and adjacent land protection from wind played a role <br />in revegetation success. North facing slopes out performed the south facing slopes in <br />vegetative cover and production. <br />• Initial poor vegetation development on the test plots might have been due to dry weather <br />conditions. However, consideration was given to increasing the seeding rate for refuse area 1. <br />• Consideration also was given to revising the seed mix for refuse area 1 to replace and add <br />several fortis that would have a higher success in grassland communities. See Table V-13. <br />• DMG was requested to lower the success standard for woody stem density as the reference <br />area contained over 3,500 stems per acre. It seemed unlikely that this standard could be <br />. achieved within the ten year bond release period without replanting the seedlings. Through <br />TR45, DMG reduced this density to 500 stems per acre. <br />• As per Greystone Consultants, a variance application requesting 24 inches of soil cover would <br />be appropriate given the vegetative and soils data collected to date and with data collected at <br />other mines in the state which indicate that revegetation success can be achieved with a 24 <br />inch soil cover. <br />A copy of Greystone's report is included at the end of this section as Appendix "A". In response to <br />TR45 application, DMG lowered the cover requirement to 30 inches with a minimum of 12 inches of <br />topsoil. <br />V.H Removal, Storage and Redistribution of Topsoil and Subsoil <br />All areas to be disturbed at any time during the construction, operation, or reclamation of the mine <br />and its surface facilities will have available topsoil or other suitable growth media separately <br />removed and segregated from other fill material. Available topsoil was determined from the soil <br />assessment contained in Section II.I. Topsoil or other suitable growth media are stockpiled in <br />Vaf10US IOCatiOnS t0 b2 USed dUiing flri5l reclar~-,aticr~. Disturbed areas to to covered with topso+l <br />. are indicated on Maps 43, 44, 45 and 46 ("D" Portal), Map 55 (Water Tank Area}, Map 92 (Alluvial <br />Wells), Map 89 (Ventilation Entry), Map 81 (Refuse Disposal Area) and Map 151 (B Seam <br />(Permit Renewal fR3, 8199) V-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.