Laserfiche WebLink
• head of 1.0-foot above the riser crest was allowed during passage of the design peak flow. The <br />peak flow used for initial design was the unrouted inflow determined by methods described in <br />TP-149. This inflow rate was compared with the peak inflow rate generated by the WASH <br />subroutine of the DEPOSITS model to determine if any adjustment in spillway sizing was <br />necessary. In all cases, the larger of the routed flow hydrograph generate by WASH or the peak <br />flow generated using TP-149 was used for final primary spillway sizing, resulting in a somewhat <br />conservative size estimate for the spillway. Final primary spillway sizing took into account orifice <br />flow into the riser perforation, orifice and wier flow into the riser, and pipe flow through the spillway <br />conduit. <br />All risers are fitted with a splitter-type antivortex device and trash rack at the entrance, as suggested <br />by Chapter 6 of the NRCS Field Engineering Manual. Specific details can be found on the pond <br />drawings shown on Maps 34, 78, 79, 80 and 80A. <br />All emergency spillways were designed to safely pass the unrouted peak inflow rate resulting from <br />the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event. The emergency spillway on pond DP-1 was also sized to pass <br />the unrouted peak inflow rate resulting from the 100-year, 24-hour storm. Spillway dimensions <br />were based on criteria set forth in Section 4.05.3 and in NRCS Technical Release TR-35 CUD <br />Method of Reservoir Flood Routing}. All spillways are constructed in non-fill earth material and are <br />appropriately tined with riprap to allow a maximum outflow velocity of 12 feet per second during <br />passage of the design peak flow, thereby reducing erosional hazards. <br />The foundation materials for all the ponds are classified as silty clay loams and characterized (by <br />the NRCS) as having low strengths and being prone to erosion and piping. Natural material subject <br />to seepage forces, such as the downstream side of semi-in situ ponds, is protected from piping by <br />toe drains or liners if required. In addition, anti-seep collars are provided along the primary spillway <br />conduits extending through the dam embankments. These collars have been designed using <br />methods contained in the EPA publication EPA-625.3-76-006, "Erosion and Sediment Control". <br />Soil surrounding all spillway conduits is carefully compacted to further reduce seepage through the <br />embankments. <br />All pond embankments are constructed of clean cohesive fill material which has a liquid limit <br />between 30 and 50, a plasticity index between 10 and 25, and containing at least 70% passing the <br />U.S. No. 200 sieve. Toe drains are constructed of free draining granular material meeting the <br />requirements of ASTM C-33 Concrete sand. <br />The "D" Portal Area sedimentation pond DP-1 has a toe drain. The entire pond is lined with a one <br />foot thick layer of cohesive material meeting the same requirements as the embankment material. <br />• The liner and the face of the dam is covered with a 6 inch layer of compacted gravel which protects <br />the liner during sediment cleanout operations. <br />(Permit Renewal r`e3, 8199) v-13 <br />