<br />'~ ~'
<br />4: . . ,
<br /> ~`;..:.'•• GUIDE FOR RATING RANGE TREND
<br /> :
<br />~
<br />~
<br />•
<br />~
<br />•~~.J;,~,_ .
<br />the
<br />potential for this site, class of .livestock, seas
<br />idertng
<br />~~~•
<br />Con3 on n+• use,
<br />;<~+6 '.recreational use, fire, and other influences, rate the following by giving
<br />;:;<•~;~.~ each item a 'rating of 4 to 0. Interpolate between indicators for ratings
<br />;,°',~a~i1 3. 2, and 1:
<br />r.
<br />
<br />;;:'-i Trend (ndicators
<br />,,7
<br />,,.,
<br />''•"^"i REPRODUCTION:
<br />''`"+'.
<br />1 Major species of the potential plant community are producing
<br />;
<br />r:`•'~ plants are of mixed ages; there is evidence of ,
<br />seedlings,
<br />' ~~ .
<br />active tillers, rhizomes, stolons ............................ (;)
<br /> Hajor species not reproducing (0) _~_
<br />
<br />11
<br />. PLANTS RESIDUE AND CURRENT UTILIZATION:
<br />f~'.!i;..
<br />; Litter produced by major species is abundant for the site
<br />';':;.•'f4 and current utilization is moderate ......................:.....
<br />,.
<br />. . (41
<br />.:~ .
<br />.
<br />,
<br />.
<br />1
<br />,,.
<br />"'
<br />~ .
<br />.; titter is absent and utilization is severe ..................
<br />" (0)
<br />3
<br />•;,, ..
<br />..
<br />!~ '' ,• COP4POSITION CHANGES:
<br />,::
<br />
<br />'
<br />Dominant species of the potential :plant community.are
<br />;~:~ ,..;:. maintaining their place in the. stand .......... ..... .... (4)
<br />,.
<br />•
<br />~
<br />'
<br />~ ~ Dominant Species are absent or noticeably decreasing in
<br />;~,f
<br />, ' ,`..percentage, while minor species and species no[ native [o
<br />''! 'the commun.i.ty are increasing ...: ............................... (0) 3
<br />~~
<br />,
<br />•a
<br />~. ; PLANT VIGOR: -
<br />`'
<br />. ,.'. ':-~ Ma or species of the
<br />.' `.: j potential .plant community are strong,
<br />:.;`;.i
<br />..........................
<br />~; health productive and well rooted
<br />y' (4)
<br />:,,.
<br />' .
<br />., ...
<br />. ::
<br />,
<br />
<br />;.,
<br />•.,,:~...
<br />.
<br />; .:: '.`Major species are. showing noticeable dfe-off ..................
<br />(0) .
<br />' ~
<br />4'
<br />1
<br />,
<br />> `SOIL. SURFACE FACTORS:
<br />;`.:,~ ,.;,... Accelerated soil erosion is not evident. .Past.erosion signs .
<br />,;:?;)
<br />f ,;. •.....:.~have healed.. Water Intake for:.the,kind of soil is favorable.. ~ (4) '
<br />.
<br />.;~ " . Accelerated erosion is pbvious. Soil stability is poor as
<br />
<br />.•;.
<br />
<br />' •.. ..~_ of ro ion sig s to be hea i ater
<br />
<br />een by failure e s n 1'ng. W
<br />s
<br />intake for [he kind of soii
<br />is unfavorable
<br />"'
<br />
<br />
<br />0)
<br />
<br />~
<br />'.`~ .
<br />.
<br />....................
<br />. _
<br />'' - ;`.Ratings between 1.1 and 20 inclusive. ~ Improving Trend / 3
<br />'~ - ~
<br /> Ratings between 0 and 1.0 inclusive ~ Declining Trend
<br />~,~ .. ~` '
<br />_ ' r'i
<br />
<br />• '
<br />'~'' ~
<br />~. NOTES ,
<br />~~ /~~s ~~S~..K~ cJ~FJ ~ UoK[ oN ~ ~~e. ,.~x~~ ~~tNsc
<br />erJ
<br />_
<br />,~
<br />..:;`t .
<br />•.f-ha ' . chest ., fo give 4r~ l,~c/;~ n< i o,,,~ pL E-he ai ks
<br />~
<br />ca(eu b; l; }~..
<br />.
<br />„,
<br />;.:i / /
<br />7
<br />7/7f1. ./},~G ~~o.~R/ G,II[liSfcy~CG/~ lJraX~1 /o be ~
<br />yco
<br />
<br />'
<br />;i.
<br />z
<br />
<br />
|