Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..,. <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Gwemor <br />l <br />op <br />Patricia A No <br />an, MD, MPH, Executive Director ~~ <br />lJedicated ro proter~ingand lmptoving the health and rmlronment d dx people o/Cobrado <br />«~ <br />4300 Cherry Creek Dr. 5. Laboratory Buildi <br />D <br />C <br />l <br />d <br />5 <br />E <br />~ <br />h <br />~~` <br />•+ <br />enier, <br />o <br />ora <br />o 80222-1 <br />30 4210 <br />. 11t <br />Aven <br />ite a~ <br />Phone (303) 692-2000 Denver, Colorado 80220-3716 <br />(3031691 X700 (,olprJdO p~p~[ <br />' <br /> <br />RECEIVED flealr6 <br />of pub <br />anaFnvirorwent <br />November 23, 199a NOV 2 8 1994 <br />Mr. Berber Keffelew Division or Minerals & Geology <br />Environmental Protection Spxialist <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 801A3 <br />Re: Off-Site Use of Detoxified Leach Pad Materials from Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mine as Roadbase <br />Teller County <br />Dear Mr. Keffelew; <br />This letter is in response to your communication of November 4, 1994, in which you requested an assessment of the <br />water-quality impacts that might result from the use of detoxified heap leach materials as roadbase by the City of <br />Victor. <br />Any water quality impacts that might arise from the use of this material would likely be limited to those that are <br />caused by rain or snowmelt coming in contact with the material, and then either flowing to surface waters or <br />groundwater. <br />With respect to surface runoff, it is our understanding that the detoxified materials will be covered with some other <br />gravels or soils, which would minimize the potential for direct surface runoff of water that has come into contact <br />wiW the detoxified material. However, it is still possible for water that has infiltrated past the top layers of gravel <br />on the roads to come in contact with the heap leach material and then resurface as runoff. The meteoric water <br />mobility test results that you supplied show that there is the potential for concentrations of manganese, nitrate and <br />sulfate in water flowing over or through the leach pad material to exceed surface water stream standards, and it is <br />not known if dilution provided by water flowing in the receiving streams would prevent instream concentrations <br />from exceeding standards. <br />Therefore, should the detoxified material be used for base course, best management practices for the control of <br />stormwater would need to be implemented in order to prevent such runoff from directly entering surface streams. <br />Also, prior to any final approval, it should be verified that the acid genereting potential of the material is low <br />enough to prevent any increase in metals mobility over time. <br />With respect to the potential for impacts to groundwater, the Division's Crroundwater Unit bas indicated that they <br />would need to see some additioml types of enalyses,.such as TCLP or acid generation potential, in order to perform <br />an adequate evaluation. Also, and perhaps more importantly, it needs to be determined whether or not the <br />Department's Solid Waste Management Section would have the regulatory authority to control the placement of the <br />detoxified materials, and what types of analyses they would want to review. <br />