Laserfiche WebLink
Part II <br />Page No. 26 <br />Permit No.: CO-0045225 <br />13. Fee <br />The permittee is required to submit payment of an annual fee as set fonh in the 1983 amendments to the Water Quality <br />Control Act. Section 25-8-502 (I) (b), and State Discharge Permit Regulations 5 CCR 1002-2, Section 6.16.0 as <br />amended. Failure to submit the required fee when due and payable is a violation of the permit and will result in <br />enforcement action pursuant to Section 25-8-601 et. seq., C.R.S. 1973 as amended. <br />14. Duration of Permit <br />The duration of a permit shall be for a fined term and shall not exceed five (5) years. Filing of a timely and complete <br />_ application shall cause the expired permit to continue in force to the effective date of the new permit. The permit's <br />duration may be extended only thruitglt administrative extensions and not through interim modifications. <br />15. Section 307 Toxics <br />If a toxic effluent standard or prohibition, including any applicable schedule of compliance specified, is established by <br />regulation pursuant to Section 307 of the Federal Act for a toxic pollutant which is present in the permittee's discharge <br />and such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation upon such pollutant in the dischazge permit, the <br />Division shall institute proceedings to modify or revoke and reissue the permit to conform to the toxic effluent standard <br />or prohibition. <br />16. Antibackslidine <br />a. A permit may not be renetved, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to Section <br />25-8-503(1)(b) (BPJ) of the Water Quality Control Act, which are less stringent than the comparable effluent <br />limiutions or standards in the previous permit, unless any one of the following exceptions is met and the <br />conditions of paragraph (c) of this section are met: <br />(I) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permit issuance <br />which justify the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or <br />(2) Information is available which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised <br />regulations, guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the applitation of a less stringent <br />effluent limitation or standazd at the time of permit issuance; or <br />(3) The Division determines tha[ technical mistakes or mis[aken interpretations of law were made in issuing the <br />permit, which justified relaxation of the effluent limitations or standards; or <br />(4) A less stringent effluent limitation or standard is necessary because of events over which the permit[ee has <br />no control and for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />(5) The perminee has received a permit variance; or <br />(6) The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous <br />permit and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve <br />the previous effluent limitations, in which case, the limitations in the renewed, reissued, or modified permi[ <br />may reflect the level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by <br />effluent guidelines in effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification). <br />