Laserfiche WebLink
Interoffice MEMORANDUM <br />to: File, C-1980-001, Edna Mine, CDMR <br />image files: C-1980-001 Hydrology <br />from: Byron G. Walker, EPS <br />cc: Daniel Hernandez, CDMG (e-mail) <br />subject: Review, December 2004 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR), CDPS Permit <br />000032638 <br />date: January 31, 2005 <br />The following checklist summarizes the results of the Colorado Division of Minerals and <br />Geology's (CDMG) review of the above-referenced report. <br />Review Checklist for Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) <br /> Requirement Requirement <br />Requirement citation complied with ? Comment <br /> ( es I no) <br /> The earlier of date of sample plus 90 <br /> days or same schedule as CDPS permit <br />1. Timely (Z8 days after close of quarter, page <br />submittal of DMRs CDMG regulation yea 19). Dates of sampling were not <br />to CDMG 4.05.13(2)(a)(iii) provided. The DMRs were received at <br /> the Division on January 28, 2005, <br /> under a W WC letter dated January 20, <br /> 2005. <br />2. Timely <br />reporting to CDMG <br />of any exceedances CDMG regulation <br />yes By exception, there were no <br /> <br />of effluent q 05.13(2xaxii) exceedances. <br />limitations <br />3. Compliance <br />with Federal and <br />State water quality CDMG regulation <br />Yes <br />laws that pertain to 4.05.1(3) <br />discharges of <br />surface water <br />Flow from Discharge Number 004T was reported as 0.005 mgd average and 0.007 mgd max <br />(weekly samples). Flows were not observed by the Division during the month of December. <br />Flow from Discharge Number 007T was reported as 0.056 mgd average and 0.061 mgd max <br />(weekly samples). Flows were not observed by the Division during the month of December. <br />