Laserfiche WebLink
These values reflect mixing with the upper two zones; however, the <br />• relative proportions suggest these values are representative of this <br />zone. The sample was sent to a laboratory for analysis. <br />The deep zone was briefly tested by air lifting for two hours and by <br />measuring recovery (Exhibit 4). Although not a rigorous test, a <br />transmissivity value of 1,684 gpd per foot was calculated by the <br />Jacob Straight Line method (Exhibit 4). <br />HOLE N0. M-3 <br />Drilling <br />This hole was drilled on May 6 to a total depth of 100 feet and <br />completed as shown in Figure 3. Because of the limited available <br />space for drilling, Hole No. M-3 is located about 10 to 15 feet east <br />of Hole No. M-2. Total flow from the 87 feet was 2.5 to 3 gpm, which <br />is much less than that encountered at the same level in Hole No. M-2. <br />• <br />Testing and Sampling <br />Hole No. M-3 was slug tested on May 8. This test resulted in a <br />transmissivity value of less than 100 gpd per foot (Exhibit 5). All <br />data did not plot as a straight line, suggesting the hole is in need <br />of further development (Ferris and Knowles, 1963). However, this may <br />be due to clogging of the aquifer adjacent to the hole by cement from <br />Hole No. M-2 as noted above. <br />A brief pumping test also yielded a transmissivity value less than 100 <br />gpd per foot (Exhibit 6). <br />• <br />