Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Anderson, 9/21/98, (7) & (15) <br /> <br />III. ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED (continued) <br />11. Is the proposed reclamation bond adequate to insure <br />reclamation (Rule 4,2.5)? <br />Bradley, 10/23/98, (19) <br />IV ISSUES NOT TO BE CONSIDERED <br />The Pre-Hearing Conference Officer has determined that the <br />following issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Board as <br />specified by the Construction Materials and the Construction <br />Materials Rules and Regulations. Therefore, the following issues <br />will not be considered: <br />1. Consistency with Routt Special Use Permit (This is the <br />responsibility of the Routt County Planning Department). <br />Anderson, 9/21/98, (1) - (7) inclusive, (10) <br />2. Visual impacts (This is the responsibility of the Routt County <br />Planning Department). <br />Anderson, 9/21/98, (8) & (9) <br />3. Possible change to Corps of Engineers 404 Permit (This is the <br />responsibility of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). <br />Anderson, 9/21/98, (11) <br />4. Noise (This is the responsibility of the Routt County Planning <br />Department and the Colorado Department of Health). <br />Anderson, 9/21/98, (5) <br />Bradley, 9/22/98, (12) <br />5. Property values, quality of life (This is the responsibility <br />of the Routt County Planning Department). <br />Bradley, 9/22/98, (12), (13) & (14) <br />