PERMFILE71622 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

05/14/1999 18:21 3037229067 III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ARK HEIFNER • PAGE 01 Mark r1.. Heffner.; Ecr3logtst vegetamn ecology 37 E35[ t;elorado AYCn1NJ Land redama[bn punning Denver, CO 8031(! ~~ ~ Visual Impxr analysis (303) ,722':94fi'i (Voice;md I :vi) [Saumemary pho[ography rr , ~ , -~~ (Fax Metho- 1 page) .QJ USSµI~~~ c'/ hB5 ~~{„ ~J,.,~ . :.. ~ Q ~G ~ (,~ 1~:: BRLJCE H17MPHRIES ~~ d,[ ~, ~v- ~ ~ ~+s ~ ~ s~i, FROM': !v[ArtK liE1FNFR. w 6~ F" P ~, ~" ~ [ i I o a ~ ~• ~ U 2 kfi::NON-ATTENDEES AT INFORMR.1: CnNCI;RENCC FOR'!'AJ3l.T-. M.Cti.iNTRiN ~GU ~ i55i +h, QIF~IRR]' ~lr~ ~ ~ ~ +s, ~ After the Conference yesterday itt Canon r'ity, it ncc~urn:d to me that the two people ~.,) P~'''~ a r-~ ~ who: filed cununcuts that were not present at. Ule pieeting ought to he infontled of the /" ~d"° ~;1I complications of-being assumed in be a party. 'they are probably not aware that ifahey do not Th[•/ ~ wfttidcaw as parties they :+re asstLmed to be purtiec. Although it is unlikely, if this whole issue , ~ / `~'~ wL:r~ to gt~ tU a.caLtrCcase they alight unwillinu}y. be drawn into something they don't want to N ~! ~ ~ ,i;.ra lie a. parr of. I assumr the I)ivisian will be providing by mail to these two panics thL; handouts l^ ~ ors ~" ,~ ~~ tha4 went provided others at dLe cvnPerence, along with an t:xplanatiun. u ° ~ 3 s a. 1r l ~,~~ We'illink the cont~rence went well and are preparing the response to Aerhan's adequacy letter. ~~ As is ofleti the case, the concerned. citizens brought up ~ lot df issues the MI.R[i really carl'r consider: It sofa would br nice ui.tind some wav to avl~id that, as it tends to make the cirirens feel .left nut rod sitmetimes makes them downright angry. 1'iu not sure how that could be Clone tht,uph. 1 think your. prop[~sed addition to the published notice helps, except for the prpblem that few people read legal nvtice.4. 14taybe it needs to be included on the posting sign as well. Ul cc~utse: the. fiig issue seems t;:> be chc road and thr: question as to whether it is or is net affected !arid. '/'here is ]ittl; question in our Hood that it is affected land within the permit M ~., botimiary as shown on the maps, bat as for the remainder of.tiie road that is a romplica[ed ~ h ., , ; issue.as there are other lessees irtvolveti. We Suslx,cl, at some point, the thoughts pf" the 1 end ~G CJ Aoard have w he considered in.this issue and whether inctutling if in the permit would ~ ~n adversely affect other lessees. 1'hat.mav t?e a to»eh nna. Sure would be trice if we,could write rules thttt ernes every circumstance ahead of time. UnfnrNnately, that would require telling the future and chat is clearly not something, the legislature ins anybody else! is very good at. Thtink vou.