My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE71541
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE71541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:20:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:54:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1993004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/4/1993
Doc Name
ROBINSON BRICK CO NAVAJO CLAY PIT FN M-93-004
From
DOW
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-- -r STATE DF COLORADO ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ <br />Roy Romer, Governor 999 <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DIVISION OF WILDLIFE <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER <br />Perry D. Olson, Director <br />6060 Broadway RECEIVED <br />Denver, Colorado 80216 <br />Telephone: (303) 297-t 792 <br />MAR 41993 <br />March 3, 1993 <br />Division OI rvuna;als ts<Geology <br />Carl Mount <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: Robinson Brick Company -Navajo Clay Pit - File N M-93-004 <br />Dear Mr. Mount: <br />REFER TO <br />For ~ldljJe- <br />ForPeople <br />District Wildlife Manager Liza Moore and I visited this proposed mine site yesterday and <br />evaluated wildlife habitat conditions. The mining area consists of high-quality grassland which <br />provides habitat fora wide range of wildlife species including antelope, ground-nesting birds, <br />small mammals, and predators such as hawks, owls, and coyotes. The drainageway on the west <br />side of the proposed mine had some pockets of standing water and some slight development of <br />wetland vegetation, but is generally dry with only fair value as wildlife habitat. <br />I wish to correct the comments made in my earlier letter (Feb. 11, 1992) because we feel that <br />at the time the incorrect site was examined. The earlier letter mentioned shrubs growing in the <br />drainageway on site and suggested shrubs be added to the re-seeding mix. Because shrubs do <br />not after all occur in the drainageway to be affected, we withdraw that earlier recommendation. <br />Also, we did not note any prairie dogs on the site as was mentioned in the earlier letter. Sorry <br />for the confusion. <br />This project will result in the temporary loss of grassland habitat in the area, as weal as disturb <br />adjacent wildlife through noise and human presence. Because grassland wildlife values are <br />dispersed evenly over a large area, it is difficult to make any specific suggestions to mitigate the <br />effects of the impacts. We think that the idea of reclaiming and re-seeding as the project <br />progresses is excellent and feel that the most important aspect of the reclamation is that grassland <br />habitat be successfully re-established in the disturbed area. We would perhaps like to see more <br />species in the seed mix which are already present on the area (only blue grama and western <br />wheatgrass currently), but are willing to go along with the SCS recommendation. Finally, it is <br />especially important that care be taken to prevent erosion from the overburden stockpiles or <br />other mining activity into the creek on the east side of the project. <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Kenneth Salazar, Executive Director <br />WILDLIFE COMMISSION, William R. Hegberg, Member Eldon W. Cooper, Member Felix Chavez, Member Rebecca L. Frank, Member <br />Louis F. Swift, Secretary George Van Den Berg, Chairman Arnold Salazar, Member Thomas M. Eve, Vice Chairman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.