My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE71445
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE71445
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:20:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:51:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/17/2006
Doc Name
TOC, Section I.a, I.b, I.d, I.e, I.f, I.g, II.a, II.f
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 19 West Pit Excess Spoil Fill and Section 16 Excess Spoil Fill
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-14- <br />Method of Construction <br />The placement and compaction of the spoil will influence its overall <br />strength characteristics. Additionally, the permeability of the fill can be <br />significantly affected by the method of construction. We anticipate Colowyo <br />desires to construct the fill by hauling spoil rock from the active mine areas <br />to the disposal site with large mine trucks, probably in the range of 120 to <br />170-ton carrying capacity. We believe the fill should be placed in <br />approximately horizontal lifts. In order to maintain comparatively high <br />permeability within the fill, The use of thick lifts is desirable. lNe believe <br />lifts on the order of SO to 100 feet in range can be used because of the <br />insensitivity of the spoil site to settlement after construction. The previous <br />experience with the Streeter Canyon Fill has shown fills can perform <br />• satisfactorily with thick lifts for the planned purposes of open rangeland after <br />fi{{ construction. <br />Method of Analysis <br />The proposed spoil will be confined within an existing valley. Sheet 3 <br />and Fig. 3 illustrate representative spoil cross-sections. Our slope stability <br />analyses were performed using cross section A (Fig. I, Sheet I) which <br />represents, in our opinion, the critical area. We believe The placement of the <br />spoil within the valley will virtually eliminate risks of stability type problems <br />within The foundation soils on the east and west sides of The valley. The <br />planned 3:1 slope of the fill indicates a factor of safety of 2.1 to 2.4 for <br />infinite slope-type failure within the fill. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.