My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE71326
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE71326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:20:38 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:48:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/28/1977
From
COLO SPRINGS PARK & RECREATION DEPT
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 2 - <br />ion. As a matter of public safety and welfare, this situation needs <br />to be investigated and corrected before any expansion is considered. <br />3) Our principal concern is the reclamation of the mined areas. We do <br />not think long range permits for expansion should be granted because <br />there is no convincing evidence that previous reclamation efforts <br />have been successful in restoring the land to its approximate original <br />state. The flat terraces of the "reclaimed" 12 acres at the top of <br />the Queen's Canyon quarry are incongruous with the surrounding land- <br />scape, and yellow clover is not an adequate ground cover. We feel <br />that Castle should be required to recontour the land to a more natural <br />form which would allow pockets of woody vegetation to take root and <br />which would conform with the adjacent topography of the area. (See <br />attachments). <br />4) Castle Concrete's expansion proposal states that the Snyder (Black <br />Canyon) quarry will ultimately be reclaimed as a park and lake. There <br />is no convincing evidence, in our opinion, that reclamation on this <br />grid hillside will be any more successful that that at Queen's Canyon <br />Quarry. In the summer of 1976 the Park Board and City Council tabled <br />indefinitely a proposal by Castle to donate Queen's Canyon Quarry as <br />a park, because there was no tangible assurance that it would be <br />conveyed in an acceptable reclaimed state compatible with park use. <br />Further, the city did not want to assume the financial burden of <br />reclamation or liability which we felt was Castle's responsibility. <br />Similarly, the Castle plan for the ultimate disposition of the <br />Snyder quarry in the year 2032 is highly unrealistic. <br />In summary, we urge you to deny long-range permits for expansion at all <br />three Castle Concrete cuarries, and to review frequently by direct <br />observation, Castle's adherence to past legal stipulations and Colorado <br />reclamation statutes, In addition, in order to assure complete and balances <br />public input on this vital issue, we request that you schedule a public <br />hearing in Colorado Springs. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />~S Lam, <br />Jud'th R. Finlay ~ <br />Chairman <br />Park & Recreation Advisory Board <br />JF:ht <br />cc: Governor Richard C. Lamm <br />Mr. Harris Sherman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.