My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-09-29_PERMIT FILE - M1977315
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1977315
>
1977-09-29_PERMIT FILE - M1977315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 4:49:26 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:48:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977315
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/29/1977
Doc Name
BESTWAY PAVIN GCO PIT 1 GREELEY CO MINING & RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION
From
LORD RV LORD & ASSOCIATES INC
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 1 body which will move toward the Cache la Poudre River at <br /> ' a speed defined by the slope of the intervening water table ' <br /> and by the permeability of the water-bearing formation. <br /> The result of this migration of the .ground water depression <br /> twill be a depletion of the streamflow of the Cache la Poudre <br /> River which is exactly equal to the volume of water pumped <br /> from the gravel pit. <br /> Whereas the actual timing of pumping from the pit may be <br /> erratic and subject to both day-to-day and seasonal fluctua- <br /> tions , it would be expected that the impact on the river will <br /> ' be approximately uniform throughout the year and equal to <br /> fthe daily average discharge from the pit. Consequently the <br /> streamflow depletion may be approximately uniform throughout <br /> I' the year. <br /> ll Compensating for the depletion to the river will be the <br /> drainage water which is discharged from the pit. The net <br /> impact on streamflow will depend upon which of the two <br /> alternative procedures is chosen for disposition of the pit <br /> € drainage water: <br /> 1. Discharge to storm sewer. While subject to much more <br /> I1erratic fluctuation than the depletion effect on the river, <br /> it may be expected that on an annual basis , the positive <br /> effect of the drainage water discharged to the river will be <br /> approximately equal to the negative effect of the depletion <br /> L� brought about by dewatering of the pit in prior years. The <br /> combined effects of both streamflow depletion and streamflow <br /> gain are illustrated schematically on Figure 1 where, for <br /> Lt convenience, both the natural streamflow of the river and the <br /> ' rate of stream depletion due to dewatering of. the pit have <br /> Lbeen assumed to be constant. It may be observed from Figure 1 <br /> that the only time at which a possible adverse impact on the <br /> Lriver may be manifested will be during the periods in which <br /> dry mining of the surface deposits is taking place, and no <br /> pit drainage water is being discharged to the River. The <br /> l manner in which the negative streamflow impacts <br /> 1 <br /> 1 -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.