PERMFILE71291

• Permit No: C1984065
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 12/11/2001
• Doc Name: pp. 3-54 to 3-61
• Section_Exhibit Name: 3.5 SOILS RESOURCE INFORMATION
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Table 3.5-3. Results of Quality Assurance Program for Analysis
•
Soluable (meg/1) Particle Size (k)
pH 6C Ca Mg Na SAR Sat.k OM(k) Sand Silt Clay '
_______
Duplicate samples
_________________ __________

_ ______ ____________ _____ ______ ___________ _________
1 7.6 0.5 3.6 1.9 0.3 0.2 59.0 1.8 4 42 54
2 7.6 0.56 3.6 1.9 0.3 0.2 52.4 2.1 6 42 52
Previously Analyzed samples
___________________________
1983 6.5 1.0 2.2 1.9 5.2 3.6 41.8 3.1 22 45 33
1979 6.6 0.8 1.4 1.0 5.0 4.6 95.0 - - - -
Table 3.5-4. Criteria to Establish Suitability of Topsoil (or
Topsoil Substitutes)

___________ Suitable
___

Parameter
___________________
Good
____________ _______________
Fair
___ _____________
Poor ___________
Unsuitable

pH
fi.0 - 8.4 _______________
5.5 - 6.0 _____________
5.0 - 5.5 ___________
< 5.0
8.4 - B.8 8.B - 9.0 > 9.0
EC (Conductivity) 0-9 4-8 8-16 > 16
mmhos/cm 8 may prove
difficult to
revegetate .
Saturation 25-80 >60
Percentage <25
Texture sl, 1, sll, cl, sicl, sc c, sic, s
scl, vfal, fsl ls, ifs
SAR < 6 6-10 10 - 15 > 15
10 - 12 2/
Calcium Carbonate 0 - 15k 15 - 30k Over 30k
Coarse Frag 3-10 in. 0 - 15 15 - 25 25 - 35 > 35
(k vol) > 10 in. 0 - 3 3 - 7 7 - 10 > 10
Moist Consistency vfr, fr lo, fl vfl, exfi
Dry Consl stency lo, so sh, h vh
1/ SCS. 1978. National Soils Handbook, Notice 24.
2/ For floe textured soils (Clay >90) IC s et al., 19781•
•
NCEC - Coal Ridge #1 3-60 ABC/1145/900301