Laserfiche WebLink
The analysis parameters that were tested for include: pH; electri- ~ <br />cal nductivity (EC); soluble Ca, Mg, Na; sodium ab~rption ratio • <br />(SAR); aturation percentage; organic matter (OM),~ and particle <br />size. <br />As part of th quality assurance program, <br />submitted for a alysis as well as a sai <br />Testing Lab analy d in the past as part <br />check on and possi ly standardize lab <br />results of these compa ative analyses we~ <br />In general, the lab analy s result <br />are chemically suitable as tops <br />accepted suitability limits f r e c <br />referred to in order to make is <br />chemical composition of the s p <br />physical nature of the soil (i. <br />~- becomes the limiting factor that de <br />du icate samples were <br />np that the CSU Soil <br />a federal program to <br />snalysis methods. The <br />favorable (Table 3.5-3). <br />vindicate that the site soils <br />ling material. The normally <br />parameter (Table 3.5-4) were <br />determination. Because the <br />ed soils are suitable, the <br />amount of rock fragments) <br />ermines suitability. <br />• <br />Thirty-five percent <br />off between suitabl <br />3.5-5 exhibits th <br />ities area. The c: <br />in Table 3.5-5. <br />doarse fragments by volume <br />/and unsuitable material. \. <br />salvageable soil depths on <br />ea~ces of the various soil t <br />was used as the cut- <br />sed on this, Table <br />e surface facil- <br />~are also listed <br />Topsoil volu es were then calculated by multiplying the alvageable <br />depth times the acreage for each soil type. Minimum, ma 'mum, and <br />average s vageable volumes were calculated by utilizing t high, <br />low, an average of the depth range for each soil becaus the <br />actual epth that will be encountered will be variable. Table 3 - <br />5 ex bits the topsoil volumes that are available for the surface <br />facilities area. <br />• <br />NCEC - Coal Ridge #1 3-58 ABC/1145/900301 <br />