Laserfiche WebLink
-z- <br />a Type II Soil Conservation Service storm distribution was used to con- <br />vert total rainfall to design storm rainfall. The Type II storm distribu- <br />tion is shown on LRCWE Table 1 Design Rainfall, calrich also summarizes the <br />10, 25 and 100-year design storm rainfall. <br />Runoff Volumes <br />Runoff volumes were computed using equation 10.10 and the procedure outlined <br />in Chapter 10 of the Soil Conservation Service's National Engineering Hand- <br />book, Section 4 - Hydrology, dated 1971. Antecenent Poisture Condition - II <br />(AMC) curve numbers (CN) were estimated for the tributary areas of each pond <br /> considering the worse case for the land use, and ground cover. AMC-II is <br /> considered applicable for average conditions and allows for a total rain- <br /> fa11 of 1.4 to 2.1 inches within the preceeding five days of the storm. For <br /> the 10-year 24-hour precipitation event, the AMC-II curve numbers indicated <br /> a relatively low runoff volume (less than 0.2 inches). In discussions with <br /> Energy Fuels Corporation personnel, it was learned that for this area, the <br /> i <br />i <br />l <br />ff <br />l <br />d <br />i <br />h <br />l <br />ll <br />f <br /> most cr <br />t <br />ca <br />runo <br />vo <br />umes occur <br />ur <br />ng t <br />e snowme <br />t season, especia <br />y i <br /> rainfall accompanies the phenomenon. In the definition of precipitation <br /> event, the OSM regulations include ". .water emanating from snow cover as <br /> snowmelt in a limited period of time." Considering a water equivalent of <br /> 30%, the AMC-II curve numbers indicate a surface runoff volume equivalent to <br /> approximately one-half inch of snowmelt. One-half inch of snowmelt within <br /> a 24-hour period of time is expected to occur more frequently than once in <br /> 10 years on the average. The state of the art for computing snowmelt runoff <br /> hydrographs is not well developed, and snowmelt with rainfall hydrographs <br /> are beyond the scope of this investigation. The APfC-II condition was con- <br /> sidered to give runoff volumes too low when snowmelt is considered. To <br /> generate flood hydrographs with more conservative runoff volumes (greater <br /> total volumes) the AMC-III condition was utilized. The AMC-III assumes a <br /> greater antecedent moisture condition which exists if greater than 2.1 inches <br /> of rainfall have fallen within the previous five days. This technique is not <br /> intended as an accurate representation of the actual snowmelt hydrology. <br /> LRCWE Table 2, Curve Numbers, is reproduced from Chapter 10 of the Soil Con- <br />' <br /> servation Service <br />s National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology. <br />Leonard Rice Consulting Waler Engineers.lnc. <br />