My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE70852
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE70852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:20:13 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:34:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/15/2002
Doc Name
Decision Notice & FONSI
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 80 Drilling Activities - TR96
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In 2001, approval was given for constmction of 6 miles of road and 18 drill pads for methane drainage wells within <br />the project azea in the West Elk IRA. Five miles of these roads were located on alignments where drill exploration <br />roads had previously been constructed then decommissioned. One mile of road was constrncted in a previously <br />undisturbed location. These existing temporary roads are displayed in Figure 4 in the EA. The effect that these <br />existing roads have on roadless character in the IRA is displayed in Figure l0 in the EA as represented by the No <br />Action Alternative. <br />My decision is consistent with Forest Service policy as stated in the Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.15, which <br />requires an Environmental Impact Statement for proposals that would "substantially alter the undeveloped character <br />of an inventoried roadless area of 5,000 acres or more". An EIS is not required for this project because this azea is <br />akeady roaded and developed. Between 1967 and 1996, the Forest Service permitted constmction of 28 exploration <br />drill holes and 11 miles of temporary road within the West Elk Inventoried Roadless Area within this 4,730-acre <br />project area. Some segments of these 11 miles of road have been constructed, decommissioned, and then <br />reconstmc[ed several times over the pas[ thirty-yeaz course of sequential coal exploration activities. Road and drill <br />pad construction in this portion of the IRA was approved through a sequence of decision documents consistent with <br />the National Environmental Policy Act. Road development and coal leasing in this portion of the West Elk IRA is <br />consistent with the current GMUG Forest LRMP direction. <br />My decision will result in construction surface disturbance on approximately 55 acres and reclamation disturbance <br />on 86 acres of the 96,281 acres in the West Elk IRA. Reclamation disturbance is greater than constmction <br />disturbance because my decision will result in decommissioning and obliteration of existing temporary roads in <br />addition to newly constructed temporary roads. This amount of disturbance is a small fraction of one percent of the <br />West Elk IRA acres. These 86 acres of surface disturbance affects roadless character over approximately 2,380 <br />acres, as displayed in Figure F10 in [he EA as represented by Alternative 5. At the present time, 1,072 acres are <br />affected in the project area by existing roads, as displayed in Figure 10 by the No Action Alternative. Currently <br />affected acres comprise approximately ] % of the West Elk IRA acres. The additional affect created by the selected <br />action is another 1 'h percent, for a total of 2 '/: percent of the West Elk IRA affected. This amount of disturbance is <br />well below the example in FSH 1909.15, Section 20.6 for classes of actions that require an EIS. <br />Based on this information, the information presented in the EA and the Project Record, and the information <br />presented in the Forest Service Response to Comment, I have concluded that the portion of the West Elk IRA within <br />the project area has little existing undeveloped character. Implementation of the action that I have selected will not <br />substantially alter the undeveloped character of this BtA, because the overall character of this portion of the IRA is <br />developed. I have concluded that although my selected action will impact the West Elk IRA, the impacts are not <br />significant, and an EIS is not required for environmental documentation. <br />Significance of Contribution to Global Climate Change r <br />Based on my review of the EA and supporting project record, I have determined that my decision to continue to I~ <br />allow methane from this coal mine to be vented into the atmosphere will no[ create a significant contribution to <br />greenhouse gas emissions that influence global climate change, therefore does no[ require environmental <br />documentation in an EIS. <br />Climate change refers to long-term fluctuations in temperature, precipitation, wind, and other elements of the <br />Earth's climate system. Natural processes such as solar radiance variations, variations in the Earth's orbital <br />parameters, and volcanic activity can produce variations in climate. The climate system can also be influenced by <br />changes in the concentrations of various gases in the atmosphere, which affect the Earth's absorption of radiation. <br />Most of [he observed warming [hat has occurred over the past 50 years is likely to have been due to increase in <br />greenhouse gas concentrations. (Source: www.epa.¢ov/globalwauuinQ). <br />Major greenhouse gases include water vapor (clouds), carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, halocazbons, <br />perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluorides. Water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas; i[ occurs naturally <br />and makes up about two thirds of the greenhouse effect. Excluding water vapor, the majority of today's greenhouse <br />effect is contributed by carbon dioxide. According to the National Academy of Sciences, the Earth's surface <br />temperature has risen by about I degree Fahrenheit in the past century, with accelerated warming during the past c <br />two decades. There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming over the last 50 yeazs is attributable to <br />Final version 5/31/02 Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.