My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE70852
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE70852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:20:13 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:34:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/15/2002
Doc Name
Decision Notice & FONSI
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 80 Drilling Activities - TR96
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For every $1.00 earned by mine workers, and estimated $0.52 in income is supported in the local azea. Mine payroll <br />was $25 million m 2001. My decision will support West Elk Mine's continued financial contribution toward local <br />community health and continued receipt of tax revenue in Gunnison County (Appendix C4 -Social and Economic <br />Values). Production of 26.8 million tons of coal (6 to 7 million tons/year in 2002 through 2005) will contribute to <br />supply energy and help meet demand for high quality, clean burning coal. <br />Factors Other Than Environmental Effects Considered In Making The Decision <br />The purpose and need of this project is to consider allowing activities on the National Forest that are associated with <br />coal mining and continued development of leased federal coal reserves. The proposed activities are needed to <br />respond to unsafe methane gas levels in the underground mine. Methane gas liberation is needed to ensure worker <br />safety and allow continued development of leased federal coal reserves at a cost effective rate (EA, Section 1.2). <br />My decision also supports continued production of high BTU, low sulfur coal reserves. This coal yields higher air <br />quality than other coal when burned. My decision supports the Purpose and Need for [his project. <br />I decided to require MCC [o close most of the existing motorized trails in the project azea by summer 2003 and <br />decommission all existing and approved future temporary roads in the project area when this project ends (expected <br />in 2007) to improve habitat effectiveness for ells and other wildlife. The two segments of motorized trail that will <br />not be obliterated include the trail that connects the Dry Fork road to the intersection of the Long Draw Saddle Road <br />and the Upper Sylvester Road, and a 2,000-foot segment of trail in fhe NW quarter of Section 26 that connects the <br />Long Draw Road to the West Flatiron road, avoiding a steep section of road and a switchback. Using Forest Plan <br />guidelines for road density calculations (Forest Plan, page III-77) the existing adjusted road and motorized trail <br />density in the project area is 4.4 miles per square mile (EA, Section 3.2.1.4). If these trails were left open during the <br />approved project, road and motorized trail density would increase to about 5 miles per square mile. This density <br />does not meet Forest Plan requirements of 40% road density/use habitat effectiveness. The existing motorized trails <br />were user-created and follow the path of least resistance, which is in the bottom of the drainages, in or adjacent to <br />the riparian area. Therefore, my decision to close most of the existing motorized trails will mitigate project impacts <br />to elk habitat effectiveness and meet Forest Plan standards. <br />Although I have decided to close most of the existing motorized nails, I have decided to allow ATV access on three <br />project toads during the big game rifle season in the fall. Public ATV use will not be allowed on roads in the <br />project area during the times that MCC is constmcting roads and drilling methane drainage wells, which is expected <br />to be May through September, annually. The existing and approved new roads are narrow, and the combination of <br />heavy construction traffic and public recreation use traffic would not be pendent or safe. <br />After the project concludes in 2007, these three roads will be converted to ATV nails and public use will be allowed <br />throughout the summer and fall. These three roads include: West Flatiron, Long Draw Saddle, and West Bench <br />Roads. The ATV routes are shown on the Decision Map at the end of Section II in this Decision Notice. I decided <br />to convert these roads to ATV nails because I believe [hat public motorized recreation use is appropriate in this area <br />and will not unreasonably conflict with other resource needs and values. Although this azea is an Inventoried <br />Roadless Area, current Forest Plan direction allows motorized recreation and constmction of roads. This area has <br />not been managed to protect its roadless character in the past, and consequently its roadless character has been <br />compromised. No roadless values will be further compromised by my decision to allow public ATV use on nails <br />during or after this project ends in 2007. Motorized nail use is not a factor that is considered to impact <br />consideration of roadless values in roadless area inventory guidelines. <br />My decision supports continued operation of the West Elk Mine, which contributes to econotmc stability in Delta <br />and Gunnison Counties. <br />Alternative 1 - No Action (EA, Section 2.3.1) was not selected because it would no[ meet the Forest Plan direction <br />to "encourage environmentally sound energy and minerals development" (Forest Plan, page I1-61). Additionally, <br />Alternative 1 would not meet the purpose and need for the project because it would not support the continued <br />development of leased federal coal reserves a[ a cost effective rate. When the federal coal leases were granted, <br />MCC was granted the right to mine and develop the coal resource. They were also given [he right to constmct roads <br />and drill pads needed [o mine and develop the coal, in locations that were not restricted by lease stipulations. <br />Selection of Alternative 1 would vioia[e the terms of the coal lease, because some of the proposed roads and drill <br />Final version 5/31/02 Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.