Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Senate spent approximately <br />House discussion focuses <br />inclusion of a property <br />protections provided for <br />nominated for inclusion in <br /> <br />four minutes discussing the Act. The <br />on the process for nomination and <br />into the State Register and upon the <br />properties which have been included or <br />the State Register. <br />It is significant <br />which resulted in the <br />eligible to be listed" <br />Section 104(2)(a). Se <br />legislative history f <br />believed inclusion of th <br />listed" in addition to the <br />leave everything wide open <br />eligible to be listed" the <br />the scope of Section 104 <br />powers only over those prop <br />that the Senate amen <br />deleting the word " <br />word "listed" in the <br />D, p. 8. The reason <br />amendment is that S <br />e words "nominated or el' <br />to give the Society review <br />word "listed" was "very br <br />." By deleting the words ' <br />Senate believed that it <br />erties which were listed. <br />ded the Bill <br />nominated or <br />fifth line of <br />given in the <br />enator Nobel <br />igible to be <br />oad and could <br />'nominated or <br />had clarified <br />and comment <br />2. Titles, definitions and lanouage of entire Act. A statute <br />should also be construed so that effect is given to all of its <br />provisions, including its defined terms and the titles of its <br />sections. The "whole statute must be read together and considered <br />as a whole, and its intent gathered from all its provisions." Clark <br />v. Fellin, 126 Colo. 519, 251 P.2d 940, 943 (1952) (citations <br />omitted). It is well established that statutory definitions of <br />terms must control judicial interpretation. Industrial Comm. v. <br />Northwestern Mut. L. Ins. Co., 103 Colo. 550, 88 P.2d 560 (1939). <br />A careful review of the definitions contained in Section 102 of the <br />Act makes it clear that the legislature only intended to protect <br />properties listed or nominated to be listed. <br />For example, the definition of "effect" is found at Section <br />102(5). "Effect" means "any change in the quality of the <br />historical, archeological, or architectural character that <br />qualified oroperty for entry in the State Register." (Emphasis <br />added). Thus, where Section 104 of the Act uses the term "effect" <br />in its title ("Effect of state register"), and everywhere else that <br />the Act uses the term "effect", it can only be referring to the <br />effects on those qualities which initially qualified the property <br />"for entry in the State Register." An agency action cannot have an <br />"effect" on a property not listed in the State Register, as the <br />term is defined in the Act. <br />The term "historical significance" is defined in Section <br />102(6). "Historical significance" only deals with those properties <br />having importance in the history, architecture, archeology, or <br />culture of the State of Colorado "as determined by the Society." <br />(Emphasis added). The procedure for the Society's determination of <br />"historical significance" is set out in Sections 105 through 107 of <br />the Act, and in the Rules and Procedures issued by the Society. <br />These Rules and Procedures, attached hereto as Exhibit E, designate <br />to note <br />Act by <br />after the <br />e Exhibit <br />or this <br />