My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE70607
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE70607
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:19:51 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:26:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Text & Appendix A
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 13 BONDING INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Calculation Cross-Sections, Maps 39 through 43. <br />• Material movement volumes and haulage distances for excavation of the drainage channel <br />connecting the recontoured West Pit drainage basin to Taylor Creek were determined by <br />comparing topographic contours for the drainage channel layout with the existing topography in <br />the azea as documented in Appendix A, Volume Documentation. <br />Material movement requirements for topsoil replacement were determined by measuring <br />the average haulage distance from the centroid of the closest topsoil stockpile to the centroid of <br />each respective disturbance area. The distribution of topsoil from available stockpiles to specific <br />replacement azea(s) was based on regraded surface area(s) and average replacement depths as <br />specified in the reclamation plan for each disturbance azea, and the total estimated volumes for <br />each topsoil pile. A topsoil swell factor of 15 percent was used to convert from BCY to LCY, as <br />stockpiled topsoil typically remains in an uncompacted state prior to redisturbance. Topsoil <br />balances for each stockpile aze included in Appendix A, Volume Documentation, and topsoil <br />haulage distances are documented in Appendix B, Productivity Documentation. <br />The volume of sediment pond embankment material to be graded into the pond <br />• impoundments during final reclamation was calculated directly from the pond design <br />specifications presented in the approved permit. The volume of material to be moved to backfill <br />and recontour ditch areas during final reclamation was calculated directly from the ditch design <br />specifications presented in the approved permit. Supporting calculations aze included in Appendix <br />A, Volume Documentation. <br />The volume of material to be moved in order to recontour the Taylor Creek and Nielson <br />Scoria Pits was calculated from specifications presented in the approved permit. Supporting <br />calculations aze included in Appendix A, Volume documentation. Volumes and azeas for the <br />other reclamation functions including asphalt removal, road width reduction, and road and <br />facilities ripping, were determined by direct measurement from maps, with corresponding azea <br />and volume figures provided in Appendix A, Volume Documentation. Reclamation volumes for <br />all areas and reclamation functions (as appropriate) are shown on the individual cost estimate <br />work sheets. <br />Selection of the most practical haulage routes for material movements involved review of <br />the existing haul road network relative to the source and destination of reclamation materials, <br />• layout of haulage segments to minimize total haulage distance and limit adverse grades, <br />determination of representative haul profiles, and elimination of any unfavorable alternative <br />haulage routes relative to construction or operating considerations. The haulage routes selected <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.