My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29683
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:35 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:18:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
1/20/1998
Doc Name
COMPARISON OF WEST ELK MINE FAULT DISCHARGE WATER WITH DISCHARGE WATER FROM THE EDWARDS MINE PORTAL
Permit Index Doc Type
OTHER SURFACE WATER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This observation doesn't eliminate the possibility that the Lone Pine Gulch and Edwards Portal <br />spring water is fault water having undergone carbon-13 depletion between November 1996 <br />(when B East Mains Fault water was first Bumped in the NW panel sump) until the samples from <br />Lone Pine Gulch and Edwards Portal were taken in December 1997. One possible mechanism is <br />the simple dissolution of methane (CHq) during the time spent in the NW panel sump. No S"C <br />values are available for either the Beaz or the West Elk mines, but coal itself typically displays a <br />"C signature typical of estuazine sediments (azound -25 per mil), with the associated methane <br />typically depleted even more in the heavier isotope carbon-13. <br />It is not unreasonable to predict that water with S"C values around that of ocean water (0), such <br />as the fault waters at West Elk, would show light carbon isotope numbers (low S"C) afrer <br />interacting with coal and coal-bed methane for a year. It must be pointed out, however, for <br />complete honesty, that the value of S"C presented for an analyzed sample of water directly from <br />the B-seam itself is highly positive (+24). This is another piece of evidence which seems <br />incongruous. <br />Other Stable Isotopic Evidence <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.