Laserfiche WebLink
COMPARISON OF WATERS FROM "FAULTS", LONE PINE GULCH FLOW, AND <br />"EDWARDS SPRING" <br /> compared to'FaulC' water. Compared to "Fauh' water Compared to Lone Pine Gulch water. <br /> Lonz Pine Gulch shows: Edwards sorine shows: Edwards Snrin sR hOlv$: <br />TDS higher(QX) higher(2X) Higher (by 20%) <br />pH slightly lower lower Slightty lower <br />Ca 4-?OX higher 12-20X higher 3X higher <br />Mg IOX higher IOOX higher SX higher <br />Na roughly the same same as much of fault water 40% higher <br />K 80X higher IOOX higher 2-2'/ X higher <br />HC03 within the range Roughtly 50% lower ~60% <br />C03 fault water numbers inconsistent fault water numbers inconsistent same <br /> ... lower than most of range .... lower than most of range <br />SO4 Much higher Much higher (7X highest fault values) nearly 2X higher <br />d2H same as range same as range .same <br />d180 same Same Same <br />d13C range on fault samples is range on fault samples is Edw is>ZX Iowa <br /> -3 to +I I: LP is lower 3 to +I l; Edwards is lower (Lighter C) <br /> than any fault # by 4X than any fauh # by 6X <br /> (Lighter C than (cult water) (Lighter C than fauh water) <br />