Laserfiche WebLink
~i <br /> <br />Introduction <br />HYDROLOGY REPORT <br /> <br />This hydrology report covers the period between October, 1984 to Sep- <br />tember, 1985. During this period the North Thompson Creek Mines were com- <br />pletely idle with no coal production at all. <br />Although no coal was produced, Snowmass has continued to monitor the <br />surface and ground water here at the mine site. This year Snowmass made some <br />major changes in the type and quality of water monitoring. These changes have <br />shown to be very successful. The major changes have been the construction of <br />of continuous flow recorder flumes in North and Middle Thompson Creeks and <br />more water removal from the ground water monitoring wells before a sample <br />is taken. <br />The amount of precipitation that fell here at the mine (Appendix I) re- <br />turned to normal levels. The rain gage recorded a total amount of 21.80 inches <br />of precipitation as compared to the 28.76 inches of precipitation which fell <br />during the same period last year. As a result of this normal precipitation, <br />Snowmass did not experience any site drainage problems. <br />Surface Water Quality <br />• Appendix II contains all the water quality data and field parameter data <br />for North Thompson Creek and the Roaring Fork River. As will be noted, the <br />quality of water upstream from our loadout facility is identical to the down- <br />stream quality. Our loadout is having no impact on the Roaring Fork River. <br />By comparing the water quality upstream and downstream on North Thompson <br />Creek with the pre-permit mean data and standard deviation data it is apparent <br />that the quality of water being discharged is similar to the pre-permit mean <br />data. The only exception to this is the downstream sample analysis on Aug- <br />ust 8, 1985. The levels of Bicarbonate, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium <br />and Dissolved Solids are slightly increased. This increase is not~due to the <br />mine discharges. These elements are coming from the experimental peat bog <br />near the abondoned ~2 mine. This increase of elements did not~show up in <br />December 1984 because the bog was not yet constructed. Also, the difference <br />did not show up in June of 1985 because of the high runoff flow in North <br />Thompson Creek which tended to dilute the bog drainage. <br />With the exception of the above elements it can be seen by comparing the <br />upstream and downstream North Thompson Creek results that the water quality <br />Changes very little when it passes over the mine site. <br />Surface Water Quanti <br />Appendix III contains stream flow data from the North and Middle Thompson <br />Creek flumes. Because Snowmass has an agreement with the Division to collect <br />data from these flumes for one year before any conclusions can be made; <br />r1 <br />U <br />