My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE70112
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE70112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:19:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:12:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Doc Name
A5 & A6 & A7
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Appendix 13-5 thru Appendix 13-7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 7.0 CONCLDSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />7.1 SLOPE STABILITY <br />The stability analysis indicated the coal refuse piles will have <br />a factor of safety greater than 1.5 based on the proposed <br />configuration supplied to us by Powderhorn Coal Company. This <br />factor of safety assumes that no underdrains will be built as <br />originally shown on the plans and cross-sections. <br />Since the test borings and the field investigation did not show <br />any water in either the slope or the underlying alluvium, it is <br />not anticipated that the refuse piles will have slope instability <br />due to the development of a high phreatic surface. Also, it is <br />• planned that a diversion ditch and berm be built on the slope <br />above the coal refuse pile to divert all surface runoff from <br />entering the coal refuse pile. Therefore, the only water to <br />enter the refuse pile will be through precipitation events only. <br />A maximum groundwater mound approximately 10 feet high was <br />calculated to be the extreme phreatic surface which is very <br />conservative, since it assumes the foundation material is <br />impervious. Actually, the underlying alluvial soils should act <br />as an underdrain. <br />The slope stability analysis was performed using three different <br />. phreatic surfaces which are very conservative. All of these <br />phreatic surfaces, along with their respective slope stability <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.