Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case No. 94CW036, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and <br />Decree of the Court Approving Absolute and Conditional Ground <br />Water Rights, Plan of Augmentation and for Change of LVater Rights, <br />Application of [he Ci[y of Black Hawk <br />Pagc 26 <br />22.e.(1) Pursuant to the June 18, 2002 Stipulation by the Applicant with the <br />City of Northglenn and the Church Ditch Company, the following provisions shall apply to the <br />Church Ditch water rights changed in paragraph 18.b: <br />22.e.(1)(a) As between the City of Black Hawk and the Church <br />Ditch Company and the City of Northglenn, the City of Black Hawk agrees that the City of Black <br />Hawk will not challenge the validity of the Church Ditch Company rule existing on the date of this <br />stipulation which requires that water be first diverted into the Church Ditch for measurement and <br />payment of pro rata ditch to sses assessed by the Church Ditch Company before discharge through an <br />augmentation station on Church Ditch back to Clear Creek to allow diversion at other points of <br />diversion for the 72.35 inches changed in this case so long as the Church Ditch Company fairly and <br />uniformly enforces this rule (unless precluded from doing so by a subsequent final order of a court of <br />competentjurisdiction issued in an action brought against the owners of the Church Ditch and/or the <br />Church Ditch Company by a third party) against all Church Ditch inches diverting at other points of <br />. diversion, whether those other points are upstream or downstream of the Church Ditch Clear Creek <br />point of diversion. The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction hereunder to resolve any disputes <br />that may arise among the parties hereto regarding the uniformity of enforcement of this rule by the <br />Church Ditch Company. <br />22.e.(I)(b) Black Hawk will allow to remain in the Church Ditch <br />such percentage of its Church Ditch inches as may be from time to time determined by the Church <br />Ditch Company board of directors to be required to compensate for the reduction in the ability of the <br />Church Ditch to carry water to its inchholders caused by the removal of Black Hawk's inches from <br />carriage by the ditch, provided that percentage shall be equal to that imposed upon all inchholders, <br />22.e.(1)(c) For purposes of resolving the issues among the parties <br />in this case, and in order to reach a compromise thereon, Northglenn and the Church Ditch Company <br />agree that Black Hawk may divert its Church Ditch inches at the points claimed in this case even if <br />they are denominated as alternate points of diversion for the decrees of the Church Ditch. Black <br />Hawk has completed the trial in Case No. 92CW059, and received an interim order of the Court, <br />dated June 4, 2002, and on June 5, 2002, Black Hawk submitted the proposed final decree requested <br />by the interim order. In the event of any appeal after the decree is entered in Case No. 92CW059, <br />Black Hawk agrees that it will diligently defend the decree in said appeal [n reaching this <br />compromise, neither Northglenn or Church Ditch Company intend that such compromise shall set a <br />precedent that other inchholders may divert their Church Ditch inches at altemate points of diversion <br />to those decreed to the Church Ditch. <br /> <br />