My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO29546
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO29546
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:05:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
1/26/1999
Doc Name
FINAL PERMIT BOWIE RESOURCES LIMITED COLO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM NUMBER CO0044776 DELTA CNTY
From
CDOH
To
BOWIE RESOURCES LIMITED
Permit Index Doc Type
OTHER SURFACE WATER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART Q <br />Page No. 26 <br />Permit No. CO-0(]44776 <br />B. RESPONSIBII,ITIES <br />16. AntibackslidinE <br />ii. Information is available which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than revised regulations, <br />guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of a less stringent effluent limitation or <br />standazd at the time of permit issuance; or <br />iii. The Division determines that technical mistakes or mistaken interpretations of law were made in issuing the <br />permit, which justified relaxation of the efFluent limitations or standards; or <br />iv. A less stringent effluent limitation or standazd is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no <br />control and for which there is not reasonable available remedy; or <br />v. The permittee has received a permit variance; or <br />vi. The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous permit <br />and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the previous <br />effluent limitations, in which case, the lia»tations in the renewed, reissued, or modified permit may reflect the <br />level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less svingent than required by effluent guidelines in <br />effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification). <br />b. A permit may not be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain effluent limitations adopted pursuant to Section <br />61.8(2)(b) or (c) of the Colorado Discharge Perini[ System Regulations that are less svingent than the comparable <br />effluent limitations in the previous permit, unless any of the exceptions provided herein is met and the conditions of <br />pazagraph c. of this section aze met. <br />i. In waters where the applicable water quality standard has not yet been attained, effluent limitations based on a <br />total maximum daily load or other waste load allocation may be revised to be less svingent if the cumulative effect <br />of all such revisions assures attainment of such water quality standard, or the designated use which is not being <br />attained is removed in accordance with Section 31.6 of the Basic Standards. <br />ii. In waters where the applicable water quality standazd has been attained, effluent limitations based on a [oral <br />maximum daily load, other waste load allocation, or any other permitting standazd (including any water quality <br />standard) may be revised to be less svingent if such revision is subject to and consistent with the antidegradation <br />provisions of Section 31.8 of the Basic Standazds. Consistency with Section 31.8 shall be presumed if the waters <br />in question have been designated by the Commission as "use protected"; or <br />iii. Whether or not the applicable water quality standazd has been attained: <br />(A) Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility occurred after permit issuance which <br />justified the application of less stringent effluent limitations; or <br />(B) A less stringent effluent limitation is necessary because of events over which the permittee has no control and <br />for which there is no[ reasonable available remedy; or <br />(C) The permittee has received a permit variance; or <br />(D) The permittee has installed the treatment facilities required to meet the effluent limitations in the previous <br />permit and has properly operated and maintained the facilities but has nevertheless been unable to achieve the <br />previous efFluent limitations, in which case, the limitations in the reviewed, reissued, or modified permit may <br />reflect the level of pollutant control actually achieved (but shall not be less stringent than required by effluent <br />guidelines in effect at the time of permit renewal, reissuance, or modification). <br />c. In no event may a permit with respect to which paragraphs a. and b. of this section apply be renewed, reissued, or <br />modified to contain an effluent limitation or standard which is less stringent than required by federal effluent <br />guidelines in effect at the time the permit is renewed, reissued, or modified. In no event may such a permit to <br />discharge into state waters be renewed, reissued, or modified to contain a less stringent effluent limitation if the <br />implementation of such limitation would result in a violation of an applicable water quality standard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.