Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiniiiiii <br />999 <br />October 28, 1977 <br />Cotter Corporation <br />P. ~. SOR 70D <br />Nucla, CO. 81421 <br />RE: Adequacy Review JD-6 Mine <br />Our file ,Yo. 77-310 <br />Dear Ms. Hugus: <br />Z have listed below several points which should be clarified or more <br />fully addressed in your permit application prior to presentation be- <br />fore the board. <br />1 ! Application Fee: a. Your application fee was incorrectly computed. <br />The correct fee is $55.00. The additional $5.20 should be forward- <br />ed to this office. <br />2.,.~Lega1 Description: a. The principal meridian should be included in <br />aII legal descriptions. <br />3. ?tine Plan: ~a. You should clearly explain how and why the surface dis- <br />turbance hsa been divided between Cotter and Y,elmine defining exactly <br />what surface disturbance Cotter is responsible for and cross reference <br />this with your large scale map. This specificity ie particularly im- <br />portant in permits applications with split responsibility. <br />b. A timetable oP expected future surface disturbance <br />should be included in the mine plan along with the starting date of <br />your operations at the mine and the anticipated termination date. <br />`/c. You should discuss the vantholes as to the associated <br />surface disturbance, from drilling them and bhe expected diameter. <br />d. I am enclosing a copq of my memo from the Division of <br />Water Resources. The points brought out in this memo should be address- <br />ed fully prior to board presentation. <br />. The mine plan should include information concerning your <br />expected total yearly tonnage of ore and waste. <br />~f. What is the JD-98 surface hole referenced in your mine <br />plan? Zs this surface disturbance covered by your map and/or reclama- <br />tion plan. <br />g. SJhere will your ore stockpile be located? <br /> <br />